Open Access 28 May 2026

Cognitive predictors of students’ perception of environmental and epidemic health threats during wartime

Received 22.10.2025
Revised 13.04.2026
Accepted 28.05.2026
Published 30.06.2026

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the influence of cognitive predictors on students’ perception of environmental and epidemic health threats during wartime. The following methods were used to identify cognitive predictors: the “ Questionnaire on Worldview Plasticity”, the “ Post-traumatic Cognitions Questionnaire”, and the short version of the “Sense of coherence” questionnaire. A specialised diagnostic framework was developed to investigate specific structural components of the psychological readiness of participants in the educational process to counter environmental and epidemic threats. The study sample consisted of 502 respondents, with a mean age of 20 years: women (80.3%), men (18.1%), and other genders (1.6%). Data collection was conducted using Google Forms during the spring-autumn period of 2025. Regression analysis was applied for statistical data processing. It was found that worldview and cognitive-emotional predictors play a significant role in shaping students’ attitudes towards environmental and epidemic challenges. The results of the regression analysis demonstrated that negative beliefs about the world are the dominant factor affecting mental health (R2 = 0.46; t = 0.51; p < 0.001), whereas a sense of coherence (t = -0.04; p = 0.026) functions as a protective factor. The perception of environmental threats is more strongly mediated by such cognitive predictors as critical thinking and plasticity. The leading role of additional cognitive filters through which students assess the level of danger posed by epidemic challenges is played by worldview predictors such as idealism and principledness. The resulting regression model demonstrated the complex dynamics of interaction between cognitive and resource-related parameters of students’ psychological resilience to global challenges. A tendency towards self-reproach may act as a mediator that intensifies anxiety concerning one’s physical condition in adverse environmental and epidemic circumstances. It was established that negative beliefs about the world are a key factor increasing the vulnerability of young people’s mental health to environmental challenges, while a sense of coherence serves as a “protective” factor in counteracting environmental and epidemic threats among participants in the educational process

cognitive beliefs worldview individual psychological readiness worldview plasticity post-traumatic cognitions

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code.
  2. Błaszczyk, M., Kovalisko, N., Pieńkowski, P., Pachkovskyy, Y., & Ryniejska-Kiełdanowicz, M. (2025). Coping with adversity: Mechanisms of resilience in Ukrainian universities during the Russian-Ukrainian War – a perspective from Lviv University students. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-025-01506-z.
  3. Bloshchynskyi, I., Hanaba, S., Kovalska, I., & Mostovyi, A. (2025). Teaching staff’s metacognitive beliefs in coping with war-related stress and searching for internal resources. BRAIN. Broad Research In Artificial Intelligence And Neuroscience, 16(3), 307-316. doi: 10.70594/brain/16.3/22.
  4. Bonnett, M. (2019). Towards an ecologization of education. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(4-6), 251-258. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2019.1687409.
  5. Foster, J. (2011). Sustainability and the learning virtues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 383-402. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2010.521260.
  6. Giordano, F., Lipscomb, S., Jefferies, P., Kwon, K-A., & Giammarchi, M. (2024). Resilience processes among Ukrainian youth preparing to build resilience with peers during the Ukraine-Russia war. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, article number 1331886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331886.
  7. Hahn, F. (2024). More trouble for a troubled geist: Finding certainty in the uncertain through creative unknowing. The European Legacy, 29(3-4), 350-360. doi: 10.1080/10848770.2024.2312673.
  8. Hruzynova, K.M. (2022). Questionnaire of worldview plasticity of the personality. Habitus, 42, 124-131.
  9. Khomulenko, T., & Hres, Yu. (2023). Short version of A. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. Bulletin of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Psychology, 68, 374-385. doi: 10.34142/23129387. 2023.68.24.
  10. Kredentser, O.V. (Ed.). (2025). Psychological readiness to counter environmental and epidemic threats: promotion in the educational space: Guidelines. Kropyvnytskyi: Imeks-LTD.
  11. Kuzmina, A.V. (2024). Modern directions, ways and means of improving the process of specialized training of high school students in strategies for social combating the consequences of climate change. In M.V. Hrynova (Ed.), Materials of the 1st international scientific and practical forumMain goals of the sustainable development strategy: Problems and prospects” (pp. 595-597). Poltava: V.G. Korolenko Poltava National Pedagogical University.
  12. Meshko, H., Meshko, O., Mamychenko, S., & Dievochkina, N. (2026). The influence of resilience and peer social support on students’ psychological well-being during the war in Ukraine. International Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 3(1), 89-99. doi: 10.64420/ijcp.v3i1.500.
  13. Mezhenska, M., Dunbar, N., & Noll, L.K. (2025). Living in the war: Living in two realities-A grounded theory of the psychosocial experience of Ukrainians enduring ongoing war in 2022-2024. Traumatology. doi: 10.1037/ trm0000603.
  14. Zlyvkov, V.L., Lukomska, S.O., & Fedan, O.V. (2016). Psychodiagnostics of personality in crisis life situations. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka.

Suggested citation

Larina, T. (2026). Cognitive predictors of students’ perception of environmental and epidemic health threats during wartime. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 32(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2026.63

Type to search...