Submit an article
Open Access 30 December 2025

The relationship between social capital, digital well-being, and quality of life of Ukrainians: An empirical study

Illia Polityka
Maryna Dvornyk-Kozachinska
https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/2.2025.06 Pages: 6-14
Received 05.08.2025
Revised 27.11.2025
Accepted 30.12.2025

Abstract

The growing digitalisation of everyday life has transformed the role of social capital in shaping well-being, making it important to understand how traditional social ties operate in online contexts. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between social capital, digital well-being, and quality of life in the Ukrainian population. An online survey was conducted among 91 participants (78% female), using three validated instruments: the KPIKS methodology for assessing social capital, the Digital Well-Being Scale, and the SF-36 v2 Health Survey for quality of life. Standardised data collection and statistical procedures ensured reliability of the results, while internal consistency analysis confirmed that the adapted scales demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in the Ukrainian context. The results established that among several tested hypotheses, only one yielded a significant result: a moderate positive correlation between the total score of social capital and digital well-being (r = 471, p < 0.001). This indicated that individuals with broader and stronger social networks were more likely to experience balance, regulation, and emotional security in digital environments. At the same time, higher levels of digital competence and satisfaction were associated with greater opportunities for social fulfilment. Other hypothesised links, including those between social capital and overall quality of life or physical health indicators, were not statistically supported. These results contributed to the emerging literature on digital mental health by identifying social capital as a significant correlate of digital well-being, even when broader well-being indicators show weaker associations. The practical value of the study lies in its applicability for psychologists, educators, and digital health specialists who may use the results to design interventions that strengthen social networks and improve individuals’ interaction with digital technologies

digital literacy; psychological well-being; social support; civic engagement; solidarity; media consumption

References

  1. Aldrich, D.P., & Meyer, M.A. (2014). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254-269. doi: 10.1177/0002764214550299.
  2. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code.
  3. Arslankara, V.B., Demir, A., Öztaş, Ö., & Usta, E. (2022). Digital well-being scale validity and reliability study. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 263-274. doi: 10.51535/tell.1206193.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
  5. Calvo, R., Zheng, Y., Kumar, S., Olgiati, A., & Berkman, L. (2012). Well-being and social capital on planet Earth: Cross-national evidence from 142 countries. PLoS ONE, 7(8), article number e42793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042793.
  6. Chen, Y., Liu, H., Lin, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Feng, L. (2024). The impact of social capital on community resilience: A comparative study of seven flood-prone communities in Nanjing, China. Land, 13(8) article number 1145. doi: 10.3390/land13081145.
  7. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  8. Danylova, T., & Hoian, I. (2021). The influence of social networks on psychological functioning of an individual: Problem statement. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 9(4), 118-125. doi: 10.31548/hspedagog2021.04.117.
  9. De Santis, A., & Fantinelli, S. (2024). Digital well-being as a new kind of adaptation to the new millennium needs: A state-of-the-art analysis. Elementa. Intersections between Philosophy, Epistemology and Empirical Perspectives, 3(1-2), 135-151. doi: 10.7358/elementa-2023-0102-safa.
  10. De Zúñiga, H.G., Barnidge, M., & Scherman, A. (2016). Social media social capital, offline social capital, and citizenship: Exploring asymmetrical social capital effects. Political Communication, 34(1), 44-68. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1227000 .
  11. Fahy, M., & Barry, M. (2024). Investigating the interplay of loneliness, computer-mediated communication, online social capital, and well-being: Insights from a COVID-19 lockdown study. Frontiers in Digital Health, 6, article number 1289451. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1289451.
  12. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review, 22(1), 23-37. doi: 10.1353/sais.2002.0009.
  13. Grottke, M., Hacker, J.V., & Durst, C. (2018). Which factors determine our online social capital? An analysis based on structural equation modelling. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1656.
  14. Judijanto, L., & Nurwanto, N. (2024). The impact of technology access inequality and digital skill disparities on social integration and life satisfaction in Indonesia. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(1), 89-101. doi: 10.58812/esssh.v2i01.346.
  15. Karabchuk, T., & Shomotova, A. (2021). Digitization, social capital, and subjective well-being across the globe. First Monday, 26(11). doi: 10.5210/fm.v26i11.12359.
  16. Lopina, N. (2023). SF-36 v2 health survey. Retrieved from https://clincasequest.academy/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/11/sf-36-v2-health-survey.pdf.
  17. Peters, D., Calvo, R.A., & Ryan, R.M. (2018). Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article number 797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797.
  18. Polishchuk, O., Samchuk, Z., Dudchenko, V., Shtanagei, D., Storozhuk, I., Zhabenko, O., & Chervona, L. (2024). Digitization and globalization: Navigating the impact on social capital, natural resources, and environmental sustainability. E3S Web of Conferences, 541, article number 04007. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202454104007.
  19. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. doi: 10.1145/358916.361990.
  20. R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org.
  21. Ramadan, E., Abdalla, S., Al Mamari, W., & Al Hosani, N. (2025). Building resilient communities: The impact of social capital on disaster recovery in Oman. Community Development. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2025.2525803.
  22. Razzante, R.J., Boylorn, R.M., & Orbe, M.P. (2021). Embracing intersectionality in co-cultural and dominant group theorizing: Implications for theory, research, and pedagogy. Communication Theory, 31(2), 228-249. doi: 10.1093/ct/qtab002.
  23. Semkiv, I.I. (2015). Psychometric indicators and adaptation of the KPIKS methodology. Humanitarian Bulletin of the State Higher Educational Institution “Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi State Pedagogical University named after Hryhoriy Skovoroda”: Psychology, 37, 136-140.
  24. Sewall, C.J., Bear, T. M., Merranko, J., & Rosen, D. (2020). How psychosocial well-being and usage amount predict inaccuracies in retrospective estimates of digital technology use. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(3), 379-399. doi: 10.1177/2050157920902830.
  25. Standards of Ethical Practice. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://stgsapar.dsasites.tamu.edu/about/standards/.
  26. Styla, R. (2009). Questionnaire for the measurement of individual social capital (Polish abbreviation KPIKS) – a tentative proposal created on the basis of the idea of resource generator by Tom Snijders. Social Psychological Bulletin, 4(1-2), 67-77.
  27. Taylor, A.W., Kelly, G., Dal Grande, E., Kelly, D., Marin, T., Hey, N., Burke, K.J., & Licinio, J. (2017). Population levels of wellbeing and the association with social capital. BMC Psychology, 5, article number 23. doi: 10.1186/s40359-017-0193-0.
  28. The Jamovi project. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
  29. Zhao, J., et al. (2024). Association between social capital, mental health, and digital health literacy among university students in China: A multigroup analysis based on major difference. BMC Public Health, 24(1), article number 19672. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19672-7.

Suggested citation

Polityka, I., & Dvornyk-Kozachinska, M. (2025). The relationship between social capital, digital well-being, and quality of life of Ukrainians: An empirical study. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 31(2), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/2.2025.06

Type to search...

Press Enter to search or ESC to close