Media image of politician as a factor for electoral groups consolidation
Abstract
It is revealed the role of the politician`s media image as a leading factor in the process of electorate consolidation. The main objectives of the research were to introduce and present the concept of consolidation by outlining the level of the problem’s elaboration in modern Western studies, defining its structure, identifying factors that take part in shaping its formation, and revealing the role of the media image of politicians through an analytical study of its components, namely visual, psychological, and communicative. The study is based on the approaches of modern scientific fields: evolutionary, psychological, sociological, anthropological, and political ones. It is presented the author’s conceptual model of the structure of consolidation, which consists of three components: 1) cognitive one: political value-orientation unity (where political values are personally meaningful to group members); a common purpose; a common understanding of ways to achieve consolidation; 2) categorical one: political identity, sense of unity with the group, attachment to it; a sense of “us”; 3) action-communicative one: readiness for dialogue and finding consensual solutions on the optimal ways of solving the tasks facing the group; to take joint action to achieve specific goals. The levels and types of consolidation are singled out, which makes it possible to study it both as a local (group) and as a social (including national) phenomenon. It is found that consolidation as a characteristic of a group gives it a better chance to defend successfully its own interests and transform the surrounding reality. Consolidation is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, the formation and strengthening of which requires appropriate social conditions and specific factors. There are described seven basic factors: an economic one, social trust, sense of public duty, selfefficacy, past experience in participating in collective actions of the political domain, information space, and the image of a typical representative of the opposition group. One of the leading factors in the consolidation’s formation of political (in particular electoral) groups is the image of a politician. Parasocial relationships provided the basis for building consolidation around the media image. The article briefly describes their basic features. A number of studies are analyzed to define components of the media image of the politician: visual, psychological, and communicative ones. The question of political image and its constituents is raised. There are identified eight elements of an effective media image of a politician that is capable to consolidate the electorate. Namely: external attractiveness and sociability; “commonality” (such as other citizens); the symbolic or archetypal basis of the image; matching the position of “public servant”; active use of media (both traditional and new) to form parasocial interaction with the electorate; to “hear” the actual requests of the society and its citizens, relying on them in the rhetoric; appeal to value basis, creation of the idea of political reality shared with the people; forming open, trusting, dialogical communication with both the electorate and the opposition forces; actualization of the sense of “us” and motivation to realize the importance of collective actions aimed at solving a particular problem or achieving objectives. The study is limited by the description of group consolidation, as in the political sphere there are also levels of social and national consolidation, the content of which may contain new components and not contain existing ones in the presented structure. Therefore, the type of consolidation presented in the article is not universal for all its varieties, and the harmonization of this issue requires a separate work, planned for further research. The results of the study bring us closer to a better understanding of the mechanisms of political groups’ unification, which are now becoming more and more effective subject units in the political arena. Note that, however, it does not provide a comprehensive answer to the technology of consolidation of electoral groups, because the authors did not aim to study the role of other factors and their parallel effectiveness along with the factor of “media image of politics”. The undeveloped idea of consolidation creates in societies the phenomenon of local types of unity, with which it is important to be able to work and understand the psychological foundations underlying their formation. It is believed that the value of work is even broader than the value of effective interaction only with electoral groups. The results can be used to consolidate various political groups (including electoral ones) – both to organize a separate association of citizens around a politician and to reduce tensions in society and reconcile its individual radical groups. The author’s model of consolidation is presented as a holistic, complex socio-psychological structure, which allows to furtherly expand the range of mechanisms of influence the electorate and thus direct the processes of organizing an electoral group around a political leader. The study of the media image of politics is presented as a completed, detailed task, relevant in the context of political transformations in 2019-2020, in particular, taking into account the new requirements of modern technologies for communication in politics
References
[1] Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese C. (2016). Populist Political Communication in Europe. Routledge. (in English)
[2] Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001. (in English)
[3] Ariely, G. (2013). Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Political Studies, 62(3), 573–595. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12068. (in English)
[4] Baranov, N.A. (2015). Vozrozhdeniye populizma: Yevropeyskiy opyt i rossiyskiye praktiki [Revival of Populism: European Experience and Russian Practices]. Vestnik SPbHU, 6 (3), 25–36. (in Russian)
[5] Baray, G., Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2009). When I equals we: Exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right-wing political party members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 625–647. doi: 10.1348/014466608x389582. (in English)
[6] Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., & Wagner, U. (2011). Emotional Consequences of Collective Action Participation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1587–1598. doi:10.1177/0146167211414145. (in English)
[7] Bultmann, D. (2018). The social structure of armed groups. Reproduction and change during and after conflict. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29(4), 607–628. doi: 10.1080/09592318.2018.1488402. (in English)
[8] Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830030103. (in English)
[9] Chayinska, M., Minescu, A., & McGarty, C. (2017). Political solidarity through action (and inaction): How international relations changed intracultural perceptions in Ukraine. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 396–408. doi: 10.1177/1368430216682354. (in English)
[10] Corner, J., & Pels, D. (2003). Media and the restyling of politics. Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. London, England: Sage. (in English)
[11] Cortland, C. I., Craig, M. A., Shapiro, J. R., Richeson, J. A., Neel, R., & Goldstein, N. J. (2017). Solidarity Through Shared Disadvantage: Highlighting Shared Experiences of Discrimination Improves Relations Between Stigmatized Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000100. (in English)
[12] Cox, M. (2017). The rise of populism and the crisis of globalisation: Brexit, Trump and beyond. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 28, 9–17. (in English)
[13] Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z. S., Larsen, M., Lorenz, J., & Koch, M. (2018). Social Cohesion and Its Correlates: A Comparison of Western and Asian Societies. Comparative Sociology, 17(3-4), 426–455. doi:10.1163/15691330-12341468. (in English)
[14] Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: a comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. doi:10.1002/ejsp.231. (in English)
[15] Dyurkgeym, E. (1893). O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda [On the division of social labor]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)
[16] Dzhi, B. (2000). Imidzh firmy: Planirovaniye, formirovaniye, prodvizheniye [Company image: planning, formation, promotion]. St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russian)
[17] Ehorova-Hantman, E. V., Pleshakov, K. V., & Baybakova V. B. (2002). Polytycheskaya reklama [Political advertising]. Moscow: Nikkolo-Media. (in Russian)
[18] Esser, F., Stepinska, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2016). Populism and the Media. Cross-National Findings and Perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck & C. d. Vreese (Eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). Routledge. (in English)
[19] Evans, G., & Neundorf, A. (2018). Core Political Values and the Long-Term Shaping of Partisanship. British Journal of Political Science, 1–19. doi:10.1017/s0007123418000339. (in English)
[20] Faer, S.A. (2001). Priyemy, strategii i taktiki predvybornoy borby: PR-sekrety obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. “Lovushki” v konkurentnoy borbe. Mekhanizmy politicheskoy karyery [Techniques, strategies and tactics of the election campaign: PR-secrets of public relations. Competition traps. Mechanisms of political career]. Kyiv: In Yure. (in Russian)
[21] Ferrera, M., & Burelli, C. (2019). Cross-National Solidarity and Political Sustainability in the EU after the Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(1), 94–110. doi:10.1111/jcms.12812. (in English)
[22] Fiorina, M., Abrams, S., & Pope, J. (2008). Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings. The Journal of Politics, 70 (2), 556–560. doi: 10.1017/s002238160808050x. (in English)
[23] Fletcher, R., & Jenkins, J. (2019). Polarisation and the news media in Europe. European Parliamentary Research Service, 1–49. (in English)
[24] Gackowski, T. (2013). Political Image as the Substance of the Political Communication in the Era of PostPolitics. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3(4), 43–60. (in English)
[25] Gagnon, J.-P., Beausoleil, E., Son, K.-M., Arguelles, C., Chalaye, P., Johnston, C. (2018). What is populism? Who is the populist? Democratic Theory, 5 (2), 6–26. (in English)
[26] Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305. (in English)
[27] Goren, P. (2005). Party Identification and Core Political Values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 881–896. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x. (in English)
[28] Grittmann, E., & Ammann, I. (2009). Die Methode der Quantitativen Bildtypenanalyse. Zur Routinisierung der Bildberichterstattung am Beispiel von 9/11 in der Journalistischen Erinnerungskultur [The method of quantitative image type analysis. On routines in visual press coverage. The example of 9/11 in journalistic rememberance]. In T. Petersen & C. Schwender (Eds.), Visuelle Stereotype [Visual stereotypes] (pp. 141–158). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. (in German)
[29] Grittmann, E., & Ammann, I. (2011). Quantitative Bildtypenanalyse [Quantitative image type analysis]. In T. Petersen & C. Schwender (Eds.), Die Entschlüsselung der Bilder [Decoding of images] (pp. 163–178). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. (in German)
[30] Guiso, L., Herrera, H., Morelli, M., & Sonno T. (2017). The spread of populism in Western countries. VOX CEPR Policy Portal: research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/spread-populism-western-countries. (in English)
[31] Hartmann, T., Schramm, H., & Klimmt, C. (2004). Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein zweiEbenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen [Person-oriented media exposure: a two-level model of parasocial interactions]. Publizistik, 49, 25–47. (in German)
[32] Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observation on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229. (in English)
[33] Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x. (in English)
[34] Janmaat, G., & Braun R. (2009). Diversity and Postmaterialism as Rival Perspectives in Accounting for Social Solidarity: Evidence from International Surveys. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(1), 39-68. (in English)
[35] Kankaraš, M., & Moors, G. (2009). Measurement Equivalence in Solidarity Attitudes in Europe. International Sociology, 24(4), 557–579. doi:10.1177/0268580909334502. (in English)
[36] Karadimitriou, А., & Veneti, А. (2016). Political Selfies: Image Events іn the New Media Field. Іn A. Karatzogianni, D. Nguyen, A. Serra (Еds). The Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere: Conflict, Migration, Crisis, and Culture in Digital Networks. Retrieved from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/27466/1/Political_Selfies_Image_Events_in_the_Ne.pdf. (in English)
[37] Kirke, С. (2010). Military Cohesion, Culture and Social Psychology. Defense & Security Analysis, 26, 143–159. doi: 10.1080/14751798.2010.488856. (in English)
[38] Klandermans, B., & Stekelenburg, van J. (2013). Social Movements and the Dynamics of Collective Action. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0024. (in English)
[39] Kochubeynyk, O. M. (2018). Lokalni poriadky solidarnosti yak syndrom sotsialnoi anomii [Local order of solidarity as a syndrome of social anomie]. Psykholohichni nauky: problemy i zdobutky, 2(12), 93– 110. (in Ukrainian)
[40] Kont, O. (2001). Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii [Spirit of positive philosophy]. St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russian)
[41] Korniyenko, V. O., & Denysyuk, S. H. (2009). Imidzh politychnoho lidera: problemy formuvannia ta praktychnoi realizatsii [The image of a political leader: the problem of formation and practical implementation]. Vinnytsia: Universum-Vinnytsia. (in Ukrainian)
[42] Lalancette, M., & Raynauld, V. (2017). The Power of Political Image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and Celebrity Politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 1–37. (in English)
[43] Lalancette, M., & Tourigny-Koné, S. (2017). 24 Seven videostyle: Blurring the lines and building strong leadership. In A. Marland, T. Giasson, & A. Esselment (Eds.), Permanent campaigning in Canada (pp. 259–277). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia Press. (in English)
[44] Leach, C., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M., Pennekamp, S., & Doosje, B. et al. (2008). Grouplevel self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144. (in English)
[45] Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017). The Limits of Partisan Prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 79 (2), 485–501. doi: 10.1086/688223. (in English)
[46] Liebhart, K., & Bernhardt, P. (2017). Political Storytelling on Instagram: Key Aspects of Alexander Van der Bellen’s Successful 2016 Presidential Election Campaign. Media and Communication, 5, 15–25. (in English)
[47] Lilleker, D. (2006). Key concepts in political communication. Sage. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292654950_Key_concepts_in_ political_communication. (in English)
[48] Mason, L. (2015). “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. (in English)
[49] McCutcheon, L.E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 67–87. (in English)
[50] Neufeld, К. & Starzyk, K. & Gaucher, D. (2019). Political Solidarity: A Theory and a Measure. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7, 726–765. 10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1058. (in English)
[51] Orzekauskas, P., & Smaiziane, I. (2007). Public Image and Reputation Management: Retrospective and Actualitie. Viesoji Politica IR Administravimas, 1 (19), 90–97. (in English)
[52] Ovcharov, A. O. (2014). Sotsialno-psykholohichni chynnyky konsolidatsii [Socio-psychological factors of consolidation]. Scientific Studies in Social and Political Psychology, 34(37), 247–257. (in Ukrainian)
[53] Protsenko, V. (2018). Antolohiya populizmu: diysna prychyna narodnoyi lyubovi ta efektyvna zbroya proty ukrayinskykh populistiv [An anthology of populism: the real cause of popular love and an effective weapon against Ukrainian populists]. Retrieved from https://voxukraine.org/longreads/populism/index.html. (in Ukrainian)
[54] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Culture and Politics, 223–234. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_12. (in English)
[55] Radtke, K. (2007, February). Transnational Solidarity in the Face of Humanitarian Crises: Trends in Voluntary Giving in Germany. In International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Chicago. (in English)
[56] Sanín, F. G., & Wood, E. J. (2014). Ideology in civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 213– 226. doi:10.1177/0022343313514073. (in English)
[57] Scammell, M. (2015). Politics and image: The conceptual value of branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 7–18. (in English)
[58] Schwartz, S. & Caprara, G. & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic Personal Values, Core Political Values, and Voting: A Longitudinal Analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9221.2010.00764.x. (in English)
[59] Shkolyar, M. (2004). Psykholohichni aspekty formuvannia imidzhu polityka [Psychological aspects of image formation of a politician]. Politychnyi menedzhment, 4 (7), 69–76. (in Ukrainian)
[60] Shmitter F. (1996). Razmyshleniya o grazhdanskom obshchestve i konsolidatsii demokratii [Reflections on Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy]. Polis, 5, 16–27. (in Russian)
[61] Simon, B. & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for Group Members: Intragroup Determinants of Collective Identification and Group-Serving Behavior. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 29, 183–193. 10.1177/0146167202239043. (in English)
[62] Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The Political Solidarity Model of Social Change: Dynamics of Self-Categorization in Intergroup Power Relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352. doi:10.1177/1088868308323223. (in English)
[63] Tarchi, M. (2016). Populism: Ideology, Political Style, Mentality? Politologický Časopis – Czech Journal of Political Science, 23 (2), 95–109. (in English)
[64] Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118–126. (in English)
[65] Turner, J., & Reynolds, K. (2012) Self-Categorization Theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 399–417. doi: 10.4135/9781446249222.n46. (in English)
[66] Voronina, K. (2009). Politychnyy imidzh ta yoho psykholohichni osoblyvosti [Political image and its psychological features]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii, Vol. 7, 20(1), 76–80. (in Ukrainian)
[67] Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. (in English)
[68] Willer, R., Flynn, F., & Zak, S. (2012). Structure, Identity, and Solidarity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 119–155. doi: 10.1177/0001839212448626. (in English)
[69] Williams, J., Brown, J., Bray, R., Anderson Goodell, E., Rae Olmsted, K., & Adler, A. (2016). Unit Cohesion, Resilience, and Mental Health of Soldiers in Basic Combat Training. Military Psychology, 28(4), 241–250. doi: 10.1037/mil0000120. (in English)
[70] Yamagishi, T., & Mifune, N. (2009). Social exchange and solidarity: in-group love or out-group hate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 229–237. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.02.004. (in English)
[71] Zomeren, van M. & Postmes, Т. & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives. Psychological bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504. (in English)
[72] Zoonen, van L. (2006). The personal, the political and the popular. A women’s guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9 (3), 287–301. (in English)