Open Access 18 January 2021

Competitiveness as an organizational and personal phenomenon in the discourse of social psychology

Received 18.01.2021
Revised 18.01.2021
Accepted 18.01.2021

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze competitiveness as an organizational and personal phenomenon, to determine its basic socio-psychological elements. The methodological basis of our approach is the doctrine of the psychology of organizations and the study of the competitiveness of the organization’s staff. Competitiveness appears in the discourse of social psychology as an organizational phenomenon, mostly an attribute of the organization’s staff. Along with this, it can be studied as an organizational and personal phenomenon both in the context of team competition with other organizations, and personal one – with other employees. Professiogenesis is an important but insufficient factor in the formation of competitiveness, as it provides only its instrumental component. The competitiveness of the employee is formed in the course of the competition. Its development is maximal if in the personal experience there was often a rivalry with similar professionals in terms of qualifications. In the absence of such experience, competitiveness may not be formed at all, even if the level of professionalism of the person is high. Competitiveness determined as a value, motivational, and instrumental (professional) readiness of the organization’s employee to implement competitive behavior, the result of which is a win in the competition. The limitation of the study is its theoretical nature. Further empirical studies of the structural elements of competitiveness (instrumental, motivational, value) as the psychological readiness of the employee of the organization for successful competitive behavior seem appropriate. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying knowledge about the structure of competitiveness in the top management activities of organizations to regulate the competitive behavior of employees

competitiveness competitive behavior organization’s staff staff competitiveness competitiveness of the employee

References

[1] Buchynska, T. V. (2016). Konkurentospromozhnist personalu yak osnovnyi chynnyk pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Competitiveness of staff as the main factor in improving the efficiency of the enterprise]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 10 (1), 74–77. (in Ukrainian)

[2] Fletcher, T., Major, D., & Davis, D. (2007). The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29 (7), 118–121. (in English)

[3] Kilduff, G. J. (2010). The Psychology of Rivalry: A Relationally Dependent Analysis of Competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (5), 943–969. (in English)

[4] Neale, M., & Bazerman, M. (1985). The effect of externally set goals on reaching integrative agreements in competitive markets. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6 (1), 98–111. (in English)

[5] Smyrnov, O O. (2007). Diahnostyka konkurentospromozhnosti personalu v systemi upravlinnia innovatsiinoiu diialnistiu pidpryiemstva [Diagnosis of staff competitiveness in the management system of innovative activity of the enterprise]. In Upravlinnia innovatsiinym protsesom v Ukraini: problemy, perspektyvy, ryzyky (pp. 566–572). Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. (in Ukrainian)

[6] Swab, R. G., & Johnson, P. D. (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competition and competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40 (2), 212–215. (in English)

[7] Ward, E. (1995). Correlates of motivation for competitive or cooperative strategy among employed of motivation adults. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16 (1), 121–125.

Suggested citation

Ostafiichuk, R. (2020). Competitiveness as an organizational and personal phenomenon in the discourse of social psychology. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 26(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.33120/ssj.vi46(49).174

Type to search...