Perculiarities of the role communication in newly formed groups
Abstract
The tendency of the role communication of members of newly formed groups depending with their status, in particular, representation of the group's image and personality-role interrepresentation are detected. It is defined that ideas about the group what was recently created depend on the group members’ status and qualitative difference of the group image among with different-status. Ideas of group members about their group; representation of their own role repertoire and the role repertoire of other group members was analyzed depending on their status. The results of the research of role identification of students and their mutual personalityrole interrepresentation are presented. It is found that personality-role idea is higher, more differentiated and individualized in personsamong people with high group status. People with average status mainly aimed to support intra-group intersubjective field of interaction. For group members with a low status, personality-role interrepresentation is more formalized and unified and reduces to general social roles, however, these individuals, including those who are rejected, are recognized by the group and take certain place in the role structure of the group, which is еestify, that they are full members of the group. Communicative distances of newly formed groups’ members in group interaction are investigated. They are understood as indicators of personal and group boundaries. The tendency to identification with a leader and distancing from the outsider on the backdrop of his proximity are described.
References
[1] Parsons, T. (2000). O strukture sotsialnogo deystviya [About the structure of social action] In V. Chesnokova (Ed.). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ. (rus).
[2] Gornostay, P. P. (2007). Lichnost i rol: Rolevoy podkhod v sotsialnoy psikhologii lichnosti [Person and role: Role approach in the social psychology of personality]. Kyiv: Interpress LTD Publ. (rus).
[3] Griffin, E. (2015). Kommunikatsii: teorii i praktiki [Communications: theories and practices]. Harkiv: Gumanitarnyy tsentr Publ. (rus).
[4] Korobanova, O. L. (2016). Rolovi aspekty hrupovoi vzaiemodii v umovakh suchasnosti [Role aspects of group interaction in contemporary conditions]. Osobystist v umovakh kryzovykh vyklykiv suchasnosti: materialy metodolohichnoho seminaru NAPN Ukrainy (24 bereznia 2016 r.) [A person under conditions of crysis challenges of modernity: materials of methodology seminar of Ukrainian NAES. March 24, 2015]. Kyiv, retrived from: http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/704987/ (ukr).
[5] Kazmirenko, V. P. (Ed.). (2013). Zasady kohnityvnoho spilkuvannia [The principles of cognitive communication]. Kyiv: Imeks-LTD Publ. (ukr).
[6] Kazmirenko, V. P. (2012). Aktyvizatsiya protsesiv vzaiemorozuminnia zasobamy orhanizatsii dialohu [Activation of mutual understanding processes by the means of dialogue]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii [Scientific Studies of Social and Political Psychology], 30 (33), 181–193 (ukr).
[7] Matyash, O. I., Pogolsha, V. M., Kazarinova, N. V., Bibi, S. A., Zaritskaya, J. V. (2011). Mezhlichnostnaya kommunikatsiya: teoriya i zhizn [Interpersonal Communication: Theory and Life]. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ. (rus).
[8] Melibruda, Ye. (1986). Ya – ty – my. Psikhologicheskiye vozmozhnosti uluchsheniya obshcheniya [Me – you – we. Psychological opportunities for improvement of communication]. Moscow: Progress Publ. (rus).
[9] Kondratyev, M. Yu. and Emelyanova, Ye. V. (2011). Sotsialnopsikhologicheskiye osobennosti vzaimosvyazi samootsenki i lichnostnorolevoy vzaimopredstavlennosti studentov [Social and psychological features of the relationship between self-evaluation and personal-role mutual representation of students]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 1, 56–73 (rus).
[10] Ryzhonkin, Yu. Ya., Andreev, A. N. and Mdivani, M. O. (1987). Metodika izmereniya kommunikativnoy distantsii [Measurement technique for communicative distance]. Voprosy psikhologii [Issues of Psychology], 1, 159–161 (rus).
[11] Anikeeva, N. P. (1989). Psikhologicheskiy klimat v kollektive [Psychological climate in collective]. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye Publ. (rus).
[12] Korobanova, O. L. (2016). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti ochikuvan ta nastanovlen' shchodo hrupovoi vzaiemodii chleniv novostvorenykh hrup [Psychological perculiarities of expectations and attitudes of newly formed groups’ members towards group interaction]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii [Scientific Studies of Social and Political Psychology], 37 (40), 136–149 (ukr).