Does attitude really exist? The anticipation model of implicit attitude
Анотація
This study presents the anticipation model of implicit attitude. According to this model, implicit attitude is a part of the general nonspecific characteristics of an object or situation fixed in an individual's experience. This experience can be applied to new objects or situations without considering their specificity and become a basis for anticipation of their properties. The validity of such an approach is confirmed by psychosemantical study. The proposed model eliminates the issue of attitude being artificial because it emphasises its functional importance in the cognition process and behaviour. Implicit attitude is considered an aspect of experience that serves as a basis for forming preliminary mental representations of objects. This approach allows for the integration of original and modern conceptions of attitude. The results obtained render a generalised interpretation of such well-known psychological phenomena as the halo effect and the spreading attitude effect
Використані джерела
[1] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
[2] Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27.
[3] Allport, G.W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark Univ. Press.
[4] Baus, C., Sebanz, N., de la Fuente, V., Branzi, F.M., Martin, C.D., & Costa, A. (2014). On predicting others’ words: Electrophysiological evidence of prediction in speech production. Cognition, 133(2), 395-407. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.006.
[5] Bogardus, E.S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research, 17, 265-271.
[6] Boring, E.G. (1961). The beginning and growth of measurement in psychology. Isis, 52(2), 238-257. doi: 10.1086/349471.
[7] Briñol, P., & Petty, R.E. (2012). A history of attitudes and persuasion research. In A.W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 283-320). NY, London: Psychology Press.
[8] Bruner, J.S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: Norton.
[9] Byrka, K., Grzyb, T., & Dolinski, D. (2019). The question-behaviour effect in intergroup attitudes research: When do attitudes towards a minority predict a relevant behaviour? International Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 297-306. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12469.
[10] Campbell, D.T. (1950). The indirect assessment of social attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 47(1), 15-38. doi: 10.1037/h0054114.
[11] Carbon, C.C., & Hesslinger, V.M. (2013). Attitudes and cognitive distances: On the non-unitary and flexible nature of cognitive maps. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 121-129. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0140-y.
[12] Carlston, D.E., & Skowronski, J.J. (2005). Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 884-898. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.884.
[13] Evans, J.S. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
[14] Fazio R.H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social cognition, 25(5), 603-637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603.
[15] Fazio, R.H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The Mode Model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75-109. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4.
[16] Fishbein, M.A., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[17] Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
[18] Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.
[19] Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
[20] Greve, P.F. (2015). The role of prediction in mental processing: A process approach. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.007.
[21] Guerin, B. (1991). Anticipating the consequences of social behavior. Current Psychology, 10, 131-162. doi: 10.1007/BF02686772.
[22] Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107-112. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275.
[23] Jones, C.R., Olson, M.A., & Fazio, R.H. (2010). Evaluative conditioning: The “How” question. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 205-255. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43005-1.
[24] Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The aha! Moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210-216. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01638.x.
[25] LaPiere, R.T. (1934). Attitudes vs. Actions. Social Forces, 13(2), 230-237. doi: 10.2307/2570339.
[26] Lieberman, M. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. In J.P. Forgas, K.D. Williams & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 44-67), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[27] Markovits, H., Brisson, J., de Chantal, P.-L., & Singmann, H. (2018). Multiple layers of information processing in deductive reasoning: Combining dual strategy and dual-source approaches to reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(4), 394-405. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2018.1458729.
[28] Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
[29] Olson, M.A., & Fazio, R.H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12(5). doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00376.
[30] Osgood, C.E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197-237. doi: 10.1037/h0055737.
[31] Osgood, C.E. (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
[32] Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
[33] Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J., & Koehler, D. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001.
[34] Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., & Demarree, K. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657-686. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657.
[35] Schwarz, N. (2006). Attitude research: Between Ockham's razor and the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 19-21. doi: 10.1086/504124.
[36] Seth, A.K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007.
[37] Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1945). The psychology of “attitudes”: Part 1. Psychological Review, 52(6), 295-319. doi: 10.1037/h0062252.
[38] Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1946). The psychology of “attitudes”: Part 2. Psychological Review, 53(1), 1-24. doi:10.1037/h0058561.
[39] Stanley, D., Phelps, E., & Banaji, M. (2008). The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 164-170. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00568.x.
[40] Thorndike, E.L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25-29. doi: 10.1037/h0071663.
[41] Thurstone, L.L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 529-554.
[42] Uleman, J.S., Adil Saribay, S., & Gonzalez, C.M. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329-360. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707.
[43] Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T.Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101.
[44] Zhovtianska, V.V. (2004). Translation of meanings in the process of advertising influence. Practical Psychology and Social Work, 5, 42-45.
[45] Zimbardo, P.G., & Leippe, M.R. (1991). Psychology of attitude change and social influence. New York: McGraw-Hill.