Beyond methodology: Theoretical foundations of triangulation in qualitative and multi-method research: A literature review
Анотація
The study examines the concept of the “triangulation approach” in the social research methodology. Triangulation is an innovative method, particularly in qualitative and multi-method research. Social scientists have recently shown active interest in applying the triangulation approach, especially for conducting in-depth research using multiple inquiries. However, this method faces criticism and misunderstanding among social researchers regarding its essence, methodology, and the credibility of the results obtained. Therefore, this study thoroughly analyses the essence of triangulation and demonstrates the types of this approach and its possibilities in social sciences. The research methodology is based on a systematic review of the literature, using 31 studies published in scientific journals. The study critically analyses publications related to triangulation, demonstrates various methods of applying triangulation in social sciences, and emphasises the advantages and limitations of its use. The theoretical contribution of the study lies in uncovering the essence of the triangulation approach and its relationship with qualitative and multi-method research. In addition, the empirical component of the study significantly improves the methodological aspect of social sciences, contributing to a proper understanding and application of the triangulation approach among researchers in this field
Використані джерела
[1] Al-Kandi, I., Asutay, M., & Dixon, R. (2013). Factors influencing the strategy implementation process and its outcomes: Evidence from Saudi Arabian banks. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 7(2), 5-15. doi: 10.20460/JGSM.2013715662.
[2] Begley, C.M. (1996). Using triangulation in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 122-128. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.15217.x.
[3] Briller, S.H., Meert, K.L., Schim, S.M., Thurston, C.S., & Kabel, A. (2008). Implementing a triangulation protocol in bereavement research: A methodological discussion. Omega, 57(3), 245-260. doi: 10.2190/OM.57.3.b.
[4] Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A.J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
[5] Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[6] Denzin, N.K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[7] Esteves, J., & Pastor, J. (2003). Using a multimethod approach to research enterprise systems implementations. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(2), 69-82.
[8] Foster, R.L. (1997). Addressing epistemologic and practical issues in multimethod research: A procedure for conceptual triangulation. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2), 1-12. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199712000-00002.
[9] Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(4). doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101494.
[10] Hopper, T., & Hoque, Z. (2006). Triangulation approaches to accounting research. In Z. Hoque (Ed.), Methodological issues in accounting research: Theories, methods and issues (pp. 477-486). London: Spiramus Press.
[11] Hoque, Z., Covaleski, M.A., & Gooneratne, T.N. (2013). Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1170-1198. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-May-2012-01024.
[12] Hunter, A.D., & Brewer, J. (2002). Multimethod research in sociology. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (1st ed.), (pp. 577-594). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[13] Jack, E.P., & Raturi, A. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29(6), 345-357. doi: 10.1108/01409170610683833.
[14] Janesick, V.J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209-219). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[15] Johnson, M., O'Hara, R., Hirst, E., Weyman, A., Turner, J., Mason, S., Quinn, T., Shewan, J., & Siriwardena, A.N. (2017). Multiple triangulation and collaborative research using qualitative methods to explore decision making in pre-hospital emergency care. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), article number 11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0290-z.
[16] Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J.S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 40(6), 364-366.
[17] Lambert, S.D., & Loiselle, C.G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2), 228-237. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x.
[18] Martha, D., Sousa, V.D., & Mendes, I.A. (2007). An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 3: Mixed and multiple methods. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15(5), 1046-1049. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000500025.
[19] Maxwell, J.A. (2009). Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (2 ed.), (pp. 214-253). Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483348858.
[20] McFee, G. (1992). Triangulation in research: Two confusions. Educational Research, 34(3), 215-219. doi: 10.1080/0013188920340305.
[21] Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2002). Multi-method triangulation in a qualitative study on teachers' practical knowledge: An attempt to increase internal validity. Quality & Quantity, 36(2), 145-167. doi: 10.1023/A:1014984232147.
[22] Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[23] Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240-259. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709.
[24] Morse, J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi-method research design. In C. Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[25] Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In M. Holborn (Ed.), Development in sociology (pp. 103-118). Ormskirk: Causeway Press.
[26] Oppermann, M. (2000). Triangulation – a methodological discussion. Journal of Travel Research, 2(2), 141-145. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-1970(200003/04)2:2%3C141::AID-JTR217%3E3.0.CO;2-U.
[27] Santos, K.D.S., Ribeiro, M.C., Queiroga, D.E.U., Silva, I.A.P.D., & Ferreira, S.M.S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 25(2), 655-664. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018.
[28] Thurmond, V.A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x.
[29] Tobin, G.A., & Begley, C.M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388-396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x.
[30] Tobin, G.A., & Begley, C.M. (2010). Triangulation as a method of inquiry. In T. Huber (Ed.), Storied inquiries in international landscapes: An anthology of educational research (pp. 423-428). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
[31] Wilson, V. (2014). Research methods: Triangulation. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 9(1), 74-75. doi: 10.18438/B8WW3X.