Nation-building process in coordinates of the societal crisis in Ukraine
Анотація
This article is a continuation of a series of publications, in which it is particularly carried out a retrospective analysis and systematized the consolidation-confrontational parameters of nationalstate development of Ukraine, singled out the complex of factors (factors of social polarization, factors of destructive/negative consolidation), which hinder the national unity and reconciliation of Ukrainian society in the conditions of a new social reality. The aim of the research, the results of which are presented in this article, is to structure the consolidation-deconsolidation parameters of the national and state development of Ukraine within the several dependent coordinate systems, and to explain that all of them together reproduce the complex (multifactor), contradictory (multivector), and dynamic architectonics of the societal crisis in Ukraine. This crisis, from its side, explains the dialectic of consolidation and confrontation in the Ukrainian nation-building. There are described the coordinate systems which correspond the indicators of societal crisis, and which particularly are the system coordinates which are reflected by the crisis of the main areas of social system (politico-legal, economic, social, cultural, etc.); the structural coordinates with such poles as institutional crisis, interests and goals crisis, values crisis, identity crisis; the temporal coordinates which reflect the crisis cycles of the national-state development of Ukraine; the sociopsychological coordinates which allow to consider the problem of crisis (mass) consciousness at the level of socio-psychological phenomena (by the dominant type of social experiences and forms of socio-psychological thinking). Each of the crisis levels characterizes quite specific aspects of the societal crisis which could be considered both in relative autonomy as well as in tight interdependence with its other aspects. By each new indicator, the components of the societal crisis by their combination reproduce new crisis quality (synergy effect). Together the components form a complex (multifactor), contradictory (multi-vector), and dynamic architectonics of the societal crisis in Ukraine, where each phenomenon (its structural component) can be considered both as a cause and as a result of the conflict-confrontational tendencies in the national-state development of Ukraine. The multifactor model of the societal crisis in Ukraine is structured as series of derivative models which recreate its crisis indicators in the corresponding coordinate systems, such as contour two-dimensional model of societal crisis (system-structural coordinates); cyclic model of societal crisis (temporal coordinates); socio-psychological model of societal crisis (socio-psychological coordinates)
Використані джерела
[1] Afonin, E., Sushyy, O. (2015). Zakonomirnosti ta osoblyvosti ukrayinskoi suspilnoi transformatsii [Patterns and features of the Ukrainian social transformation.]. Stratehichna panorama, 1, 94–108. (in Ukrainian)
[2] Babych, A. (2009). Formuvannia kontseptsii derzhavnoho antykryzovoho upravlinnia v Ukraini [Forming of conception of state antikrisis administration in Ukraine]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo, 1. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2009_1_6. (in Ukrainian)
[3] Heidegger, M. (2001). Osnovnyye problemy fenomenologii [The Basic Problems of Phenomenology]. St. Petersburg: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola. (in Russian)
[4] Kryza v Ukraini: zony urazhennia. Pohliad sotsiolohiv [The crisis in Ukraine: the affected area. The opinion of sociologists] (2010). Kyiv, Drukarnia «Biznespolihraf». (in Ukrainian)
[5] Lvov, D. (2012). Arkhetipicheskaya sostavlyayushchaya organizatsionnoy kultury [The archetypal component of organizational culture]. Abstract of Thesis … Candidate of Philosophy. Sibirskiy Federalnyy Universitet, Krasnoyarsk. (in Russian)
[6] Ovcharov, A. (2014) Sotsialno-psykholohichni chynnyky suspilnoi konsolidatsii [Socio-psychological factors of social consolidation]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii, 34(37), 247–257. (in Ukrainian)
[7] Parsons, T. (1998). Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv [The system of modern societies]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (in Russian)
[8] Protasenko, I. (2019). Krizis, obshchestvo i gosudarstvo [Crisis, society and state]. In Sotsialnyy krizis i sotsialnaya katastrofa [Social crisis and social disaster] (pp. 151–156). St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoye filosofskoye obshchestvo. (in Russian)
[9] Pyrozhkov, S., Bohutskyy, Yu., Libanova, L., Mayboroda, O., Rafal’s’kyy, O., Skrypnyuk, O., … Khamitov, N. (Eds.) (2017). Ukraina: shliakh do konsolidatsii suspilstva: natsionalna dopovid [Ukraine: the way to consolidate the society: a national report.]. Kyiv: Instytut politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)
[10] Rafalskyy, I. (2014). Fenomen ukrainskoho natsionalnoho samovyznachennia [The phenomenon of Ukrainian national self-determination.]. Kyiv: Instytut politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)
[11] Rymarenko, S. (2017). Hlobalizatsiia ta kryza identychnosti [Globalization and identity crisis.]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, 5-6 (91–92), 171– 181. (in Ukrainian)
[12] Sorokin, P. (2017). Sotsialnaya i kulturnaya dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics.]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt. (in Russian)
[13] Sushyi, O. (2017). Hlybynni ryfy ukrainskoho natsiietvorennia: arkhetypna prohrama konfliktu [Deep rifes of ukrainian nation-building: Archetypal program of conflict]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii, 5 (19), 103–121. (in Ukrainian)
[14] Sushyi, O. (2018). Konsolidatsiino-dekonsolidatsiina polirytmiia ukrainskoho natsiietvorennia [The consolidative and deconsolidative polyrhythmia of Ukrainian Nation-Building]. Psykholohichni nauky: problemy i zdobutky, 1 (11), 209–237. (in Ukrainian)
[15] Sushyi, O. (2012). Psykhosotsialna kultura derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Psychosocial culture of public administration.]. Kyiv: Svitohlyad. (in Ukrainian)
[16] Shestopal, Ye., Urnov, M., Komarovskiy, V., Mezhuyev, B., Fedosov, P., & Salutskiy, A. (2009). Krizis v zerkale politicheskoy psikhologii. Kruglyy stol fakulteta politologii MGU [The crisis in the mirror of political psychology. Round table of the Faculty of Political Science, MSU]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 5, 99– 127. (in Russian)
[17] Tenney, A. (1915). Societal Evolution: A Study of the Evolutionary Basis of the Science of Society. By Albert Galloway Keller. Science, New Series, 42 (1084), 498–499. (in English)
[18] Voynalovych, V., Biloshytskyy, S. (2013). Konsensusno-kompromisni vidnosyny iz suspilstvom u praktytsi suchasnoi ukrainskoi derzhavy: tendentsiyi, problemy, shliakhy harmonizatsii [Consensual and compromise relationships with the society in practice of the modern Ukrainian state: tendencies, problems, ways of harmonization]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, 6 (68), 29–31. (in Ukrainian)
[19] Yermolayev, A. (2014). Yednist krayiny: misiia Skhodu [The unity of the country: the mission of the East]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia, (13). Retrieved from http://gazeta.dt.ua/internal/yednist-krayini-misiya-shodu-_.html (in Ukrainian)
[20] Zhalilo, YA., Kononenko, K., & Yablonskyy, V. (Ed.) (2014). Systemna kryza v Ukraini: peredumovy, ryzyky, shliakhy podolannia: analitychna dopovid [Systemic Crisis in Ukraine: preconditions, risks and ways to overcome: analyte. ext.]. Kyiv: NISD. (in Ukrainian)