The specificity of “collective subject” concept in Ukrainian and post-soviet social psychology
Анотація
It is considered the problem of understanding and development of “collective subject” and “collective subjectivity” concepts in contemporary Ukrainian and postSoviet socio-psychological discourses. Attention is drawn to the mismatch of the problem context which serves as a framework for the analysis of “collective subject” and “collective subjectivity” concepts. It is shown that for the Ukrainian socio-psychological space this general context remains the problem of interrelation between “individual” and “social” in their influence on the collective subject posture; while for the postSoviet space the problem context is forming by the general-psychological theory of activity and, particularly, by the problem of activity’s subject. It is also noted that such a general context affects the construction of methodological foundations as the conditions which are required to a group as a collective subject. It is emphasized that in Ukrainian discourse the accent is on the development of collectivity principles, while in post-Soviet discourse the preference is given to subjectivity. It is noted that these general contexts are relevant to a wider problematic context of an explanation of the “dynamics of the whole” emergence, which is not limited to a set of its parts. It is established that the developed criteria to define “collective subject” concept make it impossible to understand the volunteering movement as a collective subject. It is made a conclusion that the problem is removed assuming that the determining factor for the collective subjectivity’s specificity of volunteering movement is another interrelation of criterion signs. There are formulated the foundations for the collective subjectivity of volunteering movement specificity’s selection and substantiated the possibility of such selection through the development of “commonality” concept
Використані джерела
[1] Tatenko, V. (2017). Metodolohiia subiektno-vchynkovoho pidkhodu: sotsialnopsykholohichnyi vymir [Methodology of subjective-behavioral approach: sociopsychological dimension]. Kyiv: Milenium (ukr).
[2] Vasiutynskyi, V. (2005). Katehoriia “kolektyvnyi subiekt” u fenomenolohichnomu dyskursi intersubiektnoi vzaiemodii [The category "collective subject" in the phenomenological discourse of intersubjective interaction]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii, 12 (15), 23–37 (ukr).
[3] 3. Moskalenko, V. V., & Dembytska, N. M. (2011). Stanovlennia subiekta ekonomichnoi sotsializatsii yak problema psykholohichnoi nauky [Formation of the subject of economic socialization as a problem of psychological science]. In V.V. Moskalenko (Ed.), Sotsialno-psykholohichni zasady stanovlennia subiekta ekonomichnoi sotsializatsii (pp. 21–37). Kyiv. (ukr).
[4] Lukasevych, O. (2013). Subiekt, subiektnist i vchynkova aktyvnist [Subject, subjectity and action activity]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii, 1(3), 44–49 (ukr).
[5] Brushlinskiy, V.O., Volovikova, V. (Eds.). (2002). Psikhologiya individualnogo i gruppovogo subyekta [Psychology of an individual and a group subject]. Moscow (rus).
[6] Zhuravlev, A. (2009). Kollektivnyy subyekt: osnovnyye priznaki, urovni i psikhologicheskiye tipy [Collective subject: main attributes, levels and psychological types]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 30 (5), 72–80 (rus).
[7] Gaydar, K. (2013). Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya kontseptsiya gruppovogo subyekta [Socio-psychological concept of a group subject]. Voronezh (rus).
[8] Miroshnichenko, O. (2014). Metodologicheskiye i metodicheskiye problemy issledovaniya aktualizatsii mnogourovnevogo gruppovogo subyekta v razlichnyikh sotsialnykh usloviyakh [Methodological and methodical issues of the research on actualization of multilevel group subject under different social conditions]. Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU, 100(06). Retrieved from http://ej.kubagro.ru/ 2014/06/pdf/110.pdf (rus).
[9] Vasiutynskyi, V. (2005). Fenomenolohichnyi zmist spilkuvannia v prostori kolektyvnoho tvorinnia diisnosti [Phenomenological content of communication in the space of the collective creation of reality.]. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M.P. drahomanova. Seriia 12. Psykholohichni nauky, 6(30), Part 1, 10–17. (ukr).
[10] Bublyk, P., Zhovtianska, V., Kalnytska, Yu., Klymchuk, N., Rybalka, V., Sliusarevskyi, M. ... Khazratova, N. (2013). Istoriohrafichni ta metodolohichni koordynaty teorii sotsialnoi psykholohii [Historiographical and methodological coordinates of theories of social psychology]. Kirovohrad: Imeks-LTD (ukr).
[11] Hornostai, P. (2012). Gruppa kak subyekt: sootnosheniye ponyatiy “gruppovaya identichnost” i “identichnost gruppy” [Group as a subject: the relationship between the concepts of “group identity” and “identities group”]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy. Spetsialnyi vypusk: Aktualni problemy psykholohii malykh, serednikh ta velykykh hrup, рр. 113–121 (rus).
[12] Tretiachenko, V. (1997). Kolektyvni subiekty upravlinnia: formuvannia, rozvytok ta psykholohichna pidhotovka [Collective subjects of management: formation, development and psychological preparation]. Kyiv: Stylos (ukr).