Role competence as a resocialization factor for drug addicts: Research program
Анотація
The research program of role competence is substantiated as a resocialization factor for drug-addicted persons; objective and subjective resocialization indexes are distinguished; stages, methodologies and research target groups are defined. Theoretical approaches to the understanding of role competence are classified as phenomenological and structural. The presented model of empiric research is based on a hypothetical structure of role incompetence of a drug addict with corresponding expressional dimensions and indexes. Social roles of a drug addict (role deviations from social normative roles, formed as a result of his/her personality’s alienation from society) are included among the latter to outline the external structure of role incompetence, as well as his/her interpersonal roles (victim, simpleton and others like that), that create pathological stereotypes on social cooperation and pull an addict into "unhealthy" communication circle; and also personality vital roles that result in self-stigmatization ("I am an addict, a pariah, an outcast"). Internal structure includes such components as: cognitive (limited nature of an addict’s knowledge about roles’ nature, as well as about mechanisms of role cooperation, that make him/her not able to get rid from dependence and to carry out successful resocialization); connotative (possessing a stereotype role set that does not correspond to age characteristics of an addict and does not assist with formation of mature, autonomous behavior; uncritical perception of role expectations in narrow communication circle; role conflicts and emotional tension) and motivational-reflexional (unconscious entry into a role, inability to valuesbased reflection of role identification processes). List of integral indexes of role incompetence is formed: low role behavioral variability, role rigidity and deep identification of a personality with the socio-psychological role of a drug addict. The hypothesis is made, that forming of role competence by means of active personality influence technologies will facilitate addict’s establishment as role subject, as well as behavioral self-sustainment and realization of his/her own senses and life values. Further research prospects are outlined, that consist of empiric model verification during formative experiment in determination of how role competence of a former drug addict influence on his/her resocializational success.
Використані джерела
[1] Gornostay, P. P. (2009). Psykholohiia rolovoi samorealizatsii osobystosti. [Psychology of role self-realization of personality]. (Master’s thesis). Instytut sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii NAPN Ukrainy, Kyiv (ukr).
[2] Mykhaylenko, O. Yu. (2016). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti rozvytku rolovoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh praktychnykh psykholohiv. [Psychological peculiarities of development of role competence of future practical psychologists]. (Master’s thesis). Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni H. S. Skovorody, Kharkiv (ukr).
[3] Gornostay, P. P. (2007). Dvumernyye lychnostnyye konstrukty kak model stsenarnykh ubezhdeniy [Two-dimensional personal constructs as a model of scenic beliefs], Psykholohichni perspektyvy, spetsvypusk, 3–13 (rus).
[4] Andreyeva, G. M. (2002). Sotsialnaya psikholgiya [Social Psychology. Textbook for Higher Education Institutions]. Moscow: Aspekt Press (rus).
[5] Asmolov, A. G. (2007). Psikhologiya lichnosti: kulturno-istoricheskoye ponimaniye razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of personality: cultural and historical understanding of human development]. Moscow: Akademiya (rus).
[6] Valentyk, Yu. V. (2002). Psikhogeneticheskaya model lichnosti patsiyenta s zavisimostyu ot psikhoaktivnykh veshchestv [Psychogenetic model of the personality of a patient with dependence on psychoactive substances]. Narkologiya, 9, 21–25 (rus).
[7] Gornostay, P. P. (2007). Lichnost i rol: Rolevoy podkhod v sotsialnoy psikhologii lichnosti [Personality and role: Role approach in the social psychology of personality]. Kyiv: Interpress LTD (rus).
[8] Petrovskaya, L. A. (1989). Kompetentnost v obshchenii. Sotsialno-psikhologicheskiy trening [Competence in communication. Socio-psychological training]. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow State University (rus).
[9] Tytarenko, T. M. (2011). Kryzovi praktyky zhyttiekonstruiuvannia osobystosti [Crisis practicians in a design of life of the personality]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Psykholohichna dopomoha osobystosti [Current problems of psychology: psychological assistance of the individual], 11(4), 34–41 (ukr).
[10] Moreno, Ya. L. (2001). Sotsiometriya: eksperimentalnyy metod i nauka ob obshchestve [The Experimental Method and the Science of Society]. (Translated from English). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt (rus).
[11] Shtayner, K. (2016). Emotsionalnaya gramotnost: intellekt s serdtsem. Rukovodstvo po uluchsheniyu lichnykh i professionalnykh otnosheniy [Emotional literacy: intelligence with the heart. Guide to improving personal and professional relationships]. Kyiv: Interservis (rus). 12.
[12] Ickes, W., & Knowles, E. S. (Eds.). (1982). Personality, roles, and social behavior. New York: Springer.
[13] Nikonova, O. Yu. (2011). Rozrobka ta standartyzatsiia testu “Dramatychnyi trykutnyk” [Development and standardization of the test “Dramatic Triangle”]. Praktychna psykholohiia ta sotsialna robota [Practical Psychology and Social Work], 7, 39–44 (ukr).
[14] Bern, E. (1998). Igry, v kotoryye igrayut lyudi. Psikhologiya chelovecheskikh vza-imootnosheniy; Lyudi, kotoryye igrayut v igry. Psikhologiya chelovecheskoy sudby [Games, in which people play. Psychology of human relationships; People who play games. Psychology of human destiny]. (Translated from English). Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga (rus).
[15] Chernetska, Yu. I. (2011). Sotsialno-pedahohichni aspekty resotsializatsii narkozalezhnoi molodi [Social-pedagogical aspects of re-socialization of drug addicted youth]. Problemy inzhenerno-pedahohichnoi osvity [Problems of engineering and pedagogical education], 30–31, 290–295 (ukr).
[16] Korablova, N. S. (2000). Bahatomanitnist rolovoi realnosti: roli i masky – lyk i lychyna [Multivariate role reality: roles and masks – face and number]. Kharkiv: Publishing house of Kharkiv National University (ukr).
[17] Yalom, Y. (2000). Teoriya i praktika gruppovoy psikhoterapii [Theory and practice of group psychotherapy]. St. Petersburg: Piter (rus).
[18] Holovan, M. S. (2008). Kompetentsiia i kompetentnist: dosvid teorii, teoriia dosvidu [Competence and competence: experience of theory, theory of experience]. Vyshcha osvita Ukrainy, 3, 23–30 (ukr).
[19] Zimnyaya, I. A. (2004). Klyuchevyye kompetentnosti kak rezultativno-tselevaya osnova kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Key competences as a result-oriented basis of the competence approach in education]. Moskva: Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov. Retrieved from http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/npo/20120325214132.pdf (rus).
[20] Rubinshteyn, S. L. (1999). Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [The fundamentals of general psychology]. St. Petersburg: Piter (rus).
[21] Kun, M., & Makpartlend, T. (2006). Test “Kto ya?” [Test ”Who am I?”]. Psikhologicheskoye konsultirovaniye: diagnostika otnosheniy v pare [Psychological consulting: diagnosis of relationship in the couple] (pp. 82–103). St. Petersburg (rus).
[22] Chorna, L. H. (2014). Rolova identychnist starshoklasnykiv [Rolevs identity of senior pupils]. Kyiv: Milenium (ukr).
[23] Test Transaktnyy analiz E. Berna (Test rebenok, vzroslyy, roditel). Rolevyye pozitsii v mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniyakh po E. Bernu [Test Transactional analysis by E. Bern (Test child, adult, parent). Role positions in interpersonal relations according to E. Berne]. Psikhologiya schastlivoy zhizni [Psychology of a happy life]. Retrieved from https://psycabi.net/testy/237-test-transaktnyjanaliz-e-berna-test-rebenok-vzroslyj-roditel (rus).
[24] Holentovska, O. S. (2017). Tsinnisno-rolova rehuliatsiia osobystisnoi uspishnosti u komandnii diialnosti [Value-role regulation of personal success in team activities]. (Master’s thesis). Instytut sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii NAPN Ukrainy, Kyiv (ukr).
[25] Morosanova, V. J. (2004). Oprosnik “Stil samoreguliatsii povedeniya” (SSPM) [Questionnaire “Style of self-regulation of behavior”: leadership]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr (rus).
[26] Leontyev, D. A. (2000). Test smyslozhiznennykh oriyentatsiy [Test of meaningful orientations]. Moscow: Smysl (rus).
[27] Sobchyk, L. M. (1990). Diagnostika mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniy: modifitsirovannyy variant interpersonalnoy diagnostiki T. Liri [Diagnosis of interpersonal relations: a modified variant of interpersonal diagnostics T. Leary]. Moscow: Infra (rus).
[28] Mykhaylenko, O. Yu. (2016). Rozrobka ta psykhometrychna perevirka avtorskoho opytuvalnyka rolovoi kompetentnosti [Development and psychometric verification of author’s questionnaire of role competence]. Aktualni problemy pedahohiky, psykholohii ta profesiinoi osvity [Actual problems of pedagogy, psychology and vocational education], 2, 9–15 (ukr). 29.
[229] Ohliad prohram resotsializatsii dlia spozhyvachiv narkotykiv sered molodi ta pidlitkiv. (2010). [Overview of re-socialization programs for drug users among young people and adolescents]. Kyiv: Foliant (ukr).
[30] Leontyev, D. A. (2000). Test smyslozhiznennykh oriyentatsiy [Test of meaningful orientations]. Moscow: Smysl (rus).
[31] Lepeshinskiy, N. N. (2007). Adaptatsiya oprosnika “Shkala psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya” K. Ryff [Adaptation of the questionnaire “Scale of psychological well-being” by K. Riff]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal], 3 (15), 24–37 (rus).
[32] Kapustina, A. N. (2001). Mnogofaktornaya lichnostnaya metodika R. Kettella [Multifactorial personal technique of R. Cattell]. St. Petersburg: Rech (rus). 33.
[33] Pyatnitskaya, Y. N. (2008). Obshchaya i chastnaya narkologiya: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [General and private narcology: A guide for doctors]. Moscow: Meditsina (rus).