Communicative barriers of youth’s national and civic self-identification in various subsystems of social interaction
Анотація
It is analyzed the results of empirical study of national and civic self-identification communicative barriers of young people, which was carried out by the method of indepth interviews, the “Who am I?” technique, the technique for value orientations’ identification and repertoire ranked grids. Criteria and indicators of various types of communicative barriers (such as social, information-ideological, individual psychological, content and operational ones) are determined. There are revealed the subsystems of social interaction in which the process of self-identification of young people is taking place: the nearest social group (friends); group members; family; teachers; friends from other countries; social media (Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Twitter); traditional media (Internet news, television news); cultural and artistic works (fiction, cinema and music) as well as art performers (actors, musicians, dancers). The dominant barriers of national and civic self-identification were defined. It was proposed the technological scheme to overcome the communicative barriers of national and civic self-identification through their actualization (diagnostic technologies: recognition of barriers, determination of their influence on self-identification, determination of reference groups of influence on self-identification), through their reflection (reflexive technologies: estimation of manifestations multiplicity in subsystems of social interaction, determination of comfort / discomfort zones, estimation of own behavior adequacy, reflection of possible behavior strategies), transformation into various subsystems of social interaction (technologies of transformation: motivation for the own communicative experience transformation, mastering of optimization skills on interpersonal interaction) and experience integration (technologies of experience conceptualization: consolidation of motivation to auto-correction and transformation of the acquired experience, development of readiness to apply new knowledge, skills and abilities in real social interaction)
Використані джерела
[1] Dukhnevych, V. M., & Sivers, Z. F. (2013). Kohnityvne spilkuvannia v umovakh utrudnenoi vzaiemodii ta podolannia barieriv u mizhosobovykh komunikatsiiakh ta stosunkakh [Cognitive communication in complicated interactions and overcoming barriers in interpersonal communication and relationships]. In V. P. Kazmirenko (Ed.), Zasady kohnityvnoi psykholohii spilkuvannia [Principles of cognitive psychology of communication] (p. 331–386). Kirovohrad: ImeksLTD Publ. (ukr).
[2] Stinbergen V. van (Ed.). (2005). Umovy hromadianstva [The conditions of citizenship] (p. 49–70). Kyiv: Ukrainskyi Tsentr dukhovnoi kultury (ukr).
[3] Erikson, E. (1996). Identyichnost: yunost i krizis [Identity youth and crisis]. Moscow: Progress Publ. (rus).
[4] Leeds-Hurwitz W. (Ed.). (1995). Introducing social approaches. Social approaches to сommunication (pр. 3–20). New York: Gilford.
[5] Rumyantseva, T. V. (2006). Psikhologicheskoye konsultirovaniye: diagnostika otnosheniy v pare [Psychological counseling: diagnosis of relationships in couples]. St.-Petersburg: Rech Publ. (rus).
[6] Yadov, V. A. (1994). Sotsialnaya identifikatsiya v krizisnom obshchestve [Social identification in a crisis society]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological journal], 1, 35–52 (rus).
[7] Merton, R., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. (2000) Fokusirovannoye intervyu [The focussed interview]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Instityte of Youth (rus).
[8] Sosniuk, O. P. (2008). Diahnostyka osoblyvostey osobystisnoi aktyvnosti subiektiv innovatsiinoi diialnosti yakisnymy metodamy [Diagnostics of peculiarities of personal activity of subjects of innovative activity by qualitative methods]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka APN Ukrainy [Actual problems of psychology], vol. 7, is. 16, 163–168 (ukr).
[9] Sosniuk, O. P. (2011). Proektyvna metodyka “Kreatyvnyi prostir” yak psykhodiahnostychnyi ta doslidnytskyi instrument [Projective technique “Creative space” as a psycho-diagnostic and research tool]. Visnyk Harkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina [Bulletin of Kharkiv National University named after V. N. Karazin], 971, 145–151 (ukr).
[10] Sosniuk, O. P. (2012). Psykhosemantychna interpretatsiia vizualnykh obraziv u prykladnykh doslidzhenniakh [Psychosemantic interpretation of visual images in applied research]. Nauka i osvita [Science and education], 9, 201– 205 (ukr).
[11] Tajfel, H., Figment, C, Billig, M., & Bundy, R. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177.