The Problem of Personality’s Choice of The Ways of Political-and-Legal Self- Determination in the Situation of Social Upheavals
Анотація
The article is dedicated to the creation of theoretical foundations for the study and optimization of those subjective strategies to which the person uses while solving the problems of political and legal identification. The author defends the notion that during the period of social upheavals in Ukraine, the result of social ization (in particular, acquisition of political and legal identity) depends not only on the competing influences of various agents of socialization but on how the person chooses between different ways of comprehension of reality. The necessity of the studying of the subjective ways of implementing identity elections, and not only studying the content and structure of the identities acquired by it, is emphasized. The article notes that J. Marsia’s conception of the identity status is aimed at revealing the ways with the help of which the subject of socialization creates the semantic basis of their identification choices. It is shown that the type of individual’s selflimitation, which violates the stabilization or modification of the acquired model of identity, gives an opportunity to highlight four basic strategies of an interaction of the subject of choice with different variants of constructing reality. Such strategies are: balanced implementation of intentions of self-realization and self-development (“identity achievement”); the mutual restriction of these intentions (“foreclosure identity”); mainly the restriction of the intention of self-realization (“identity diffusion”) or, preferably, the intention of self-development (“moratorium on identity”). The author concludes that the involvement of the subject of socialization in communicative practices, where his semantic self-limitations will be removed contributes to overcoming of identity crises
Використані джерела
[1] Ginger, S. & Ginger, A. (1999). Geshtalt-terapiya kontakta [Gestalt-contact therapy]. St. Petersburg: Spetsialnaya literatura Publ. (rus).
[2] Gornostay, P. P. (2015). Hromadianska identychnist ukraintsiv i yii evoliutsiia [Civic identity of Ukrainians and their evolution]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii [Problems of Political Psychology], 2 (16), 98–111 (ukr) .
[3] Dukhnevych, V. M. (2016). Osoblyvosti polityko-pravovoi aktyvnosti molodi v umovakh transformatsii ukrainskoho suspilstva [Features of political and legal activity of youth in the conditions of transformation of Ukrainian society]. Yurydychna psykholohiia [Legal Psychology], 1 (18), 33–45 (ukr).
[4] Ilyasov, F. N. (2000). Politicheskaya sotsializatsiya [Political socialization]. In F. N. Ilyasov, Politicheskiy marketing. Iskusstvo i nauka pobezhdat na vyborakh [Political marketing. Art and science nin elections]. Moscow: IMA-press Publ., pp. 32–38 (rus).
[5] Kravchuk, S. L. (2017). Do problemy doslidzhennia dukhovnykh tsinnostei ta nekonstruktyvykh form povedinky molodi u polityko-pravovii sferi v umovakh voiennoho konfliktu [To the problem of the study of spiritual values and nonconstructive forms of youth behavior in the political and legal sphere in the context of a military conflict]. Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Psykholohichni nauky [Scientific Bulletin of the National Pedagogical University named after M. P. Dragomanov. Psychological sciences], 6 (51), 182–190 (ukr).
[6] Osadko, O. Yu. (2016). Obshcheniye kak eliksir zdorovya (Kommunikativnyye mekhanizmy sanogeneza lichnosti) [Communication as an Elixir of Health (Communicative mechanisms of the personality sanogenesis)]. Kyiv: Millenium Publ. (rus).
[7] Ostapenko, I. V. (2016). Kontseptualni zasady doslidzhennia komunikatyvnykh barieriv natsionalnoi i hromadianskoi identyfikatsii [Conceptual framework for studying the communication barriers of national and civic identification]. Ukrainskyi psykholohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Psychological Journal], 2, 73–84.
[8] Semenova, Yu. A. (2004). Kryza identychnosti v umovakh transformatsii systemy tsinnostei [Identity crisis in the context of the transformation of the value system]. Humanitarnyi chasopys [Gumanitarian Newsletter], 1, 96–103 (ukr).
[9] Sivers, Z. F. (2015). Uiavlennia molodi pro vlasni prava yak pokaznyk ochikuvan instytutsionalnoi spravedlyvosti [Representation of young people about their rights as an indicator of the expectations of institutional justice]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii [Scientific Studies in Social and Political Psychology], 35 (38), 175–185 (ukr).
[10] Sknar, O. M. (2017). Model empirychnoho doslidzhennia komunikatyvnykh praktyk rozvytku samosvidomosti yak chynnyka hromadianskoi i natsionalnoi samoidentyfíkatsii molodi [Model of empirical research of communicative practices of the development of self-awareness as a factor in the civic and national identity of young people]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii [Problems of Political Psychology], 5 (19), 179–187 (ukr).
[11] Tytarenko, T. M. (2017). Osobystist pered vyklykamy viiny: psykholohichni naslidky travmatyzatsii [Personality before the challenges of war: the psychological consequences of traumatism]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii [Problems of Political Psychology], 5 (19), P. 3–11 (ukr).
[12] Shevchenko, Z. V. (2007). Kryza identychnosti yak destruktyvnyi proiav indyvidualizmu: sotsialno-fílosofskyi analiz [Identity crisis as destructive manifestation of individualism: socio-philosophical analysis]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia: Filosofiia [Bulletin of the University. Series: Philosophy], 106, 37–46 (ukr).
[13] Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In Adelson J. (ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: John Wiley, pp. 159–187, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Marcia.
[14] Merelman, R. M. (1986). Revitalizing Political Socialization. In Hermann M. (ed.), Political Pshychology. San-Francisco, pp. 279–319.
[15] Wasburn, Ph. (1994). A life Course Model of Political Socialization. Politics and Individual, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–26.