Structural and Logical Model of Citizens’ Reflection of the Principles of Mutual Understanding on Values in Modern Ukraine
Анотація
The article covers one of the stages of social and psychological research of mutual understanding on values among Ukrainian citizens in a context of the military conflict. Its goal was to determine the parameters by which respondents make reflexive inferences about such an understanding. By the semi-standardized interview method, 45 residents of Kyiv were interviewed. They were asked to evaluate the previously developed list of the principles of mutual understanding. According to the results of content analysis of the received answers, nine parameters are selected. Seven of them are of formal-logical character: agreement/disagreement with the proposed principle (the degree of acceptance of its appropriateness, recognition of expediency of implementation in public life); assessment of effectiveness of the principle implementation (the degree of belief in the fact that its implementation will contribute to achievement of mutual understanding on values in society); assessment of the current state of affairs in society (statement, mostly negative, of general socio-economic situation or characteristic of its special aspects); attempts to explain causes of social processes (reasoning about the grounds for the emergence of certain phenomena and conditions of their course); search of probable perpetrators (determination of any of social development agents’ fault, an attempt to explain the relevant processes as a result of their activities); making other suggestions (trying to change the discourse of a problem, to offer one’s own vision of events and phenomena); induction to change or action (justification of the need to act in a certain direction, advocating the correct, by the respondent’s opinion, changes). The two parameters are relatively more meaningful: political and ideological assessments and assessments of state power. With the help of cluster analysis, the main directions of Ukrainian citizens’ reflection of the principles of mutual understanding are presented: general assessment of the socio-political situation, orientation towards the future, conspiracy explanations, change of discourse, assessment of the influence of external and internal factors, assessment of patriotism and of the social development prospects. Subsequently, the described parameters should form the structural and logical basis for the practical organization of citizens’ reflection of the principles of mutual understanding on values in modern Ukraine
Використані джерела
[1] Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2016). Porozuminnia shchodo Donbasu: osud, spivchuttia i tsinnisna pereoriientatsiia [Mutual understanding toward Donbas: conviction, sympathy, and value reorientation]. Psykholoho-ekonomichni vektory rozvytku osobystosti i suspilstva: Materialy III Vseukrainskoho naukovo-praktychnoho seminaru 27 zhovtnia 2016 r., m. Zaporizhzhia [The Psychological and Economic Vectors of Personality and Society Development: Materials of III AllUkrainian scientific and practical seminar October, 27, 2016, Zaporizhzhia]. Zaporizhzhia, 2016, 22–24 (ukr);
[2] Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2016). Perspektyvy tsinnisnoho porozuminnia ukraintsiv Skhodu i Zakhodu v otsinkakh podii na Donbasi [The prospects of Eastern and Western Ukrainians’ mutual understanding on values in the evaluations of the events on Donbas]. Ukrainskyi psykholohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Psychological Journal], 2, 7–18 (ukr);
[3] Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2016). Psykholohichni aspekty tsinnisnoho porozuminnia ukraintsiv v umovakh voiennoho konfliktu [The psychological aspects of Ukrainians’ mutual understanding on values in the terms of the military conflict]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii [Problems of Political Psychology], 4(18), 3–14 (ukr);
[4] Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2017). Pozytsii meshkantsiv Skhodu i Zakhodu Ukrainy shchodo podii na Donbasi yak osnova maibutnioho tsinnisnoho porozuminnia [Eastern and Western Ukraine inhabitants’ position toward the events on Donbas as a base of future mutual understanding on values]. Ukrainskyi psykholohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Psychological Journal], 1 (3), 8–16 (ukr);
[5] Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2017). Implitsytnyi zmist stavlennia ukraintsiv do viiny na Donbasi [Implicit content of Ukrainians’ attitudes toward the war on Donbas]. Ukrainskyi psykholohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Psychological Journal], 3 (5), 42–53 (ukr).
[6] Zimovin, O. I., Zaika, Ye. V. (2017). Stymuliatsiia ta vrivnovazhennia refleksyvnykh proiaviv osobystosti [Stimulating and balancing personality’s reflexive manifestations]. Osobystist, suspilstvo, zakon: psykholohichni problemy ta shliakhy ikh rozviazannia: zbirnyk tez dopovidei mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, prysviachenoi pamiati profesora S. P. Bocharovoi (30 berez. 2017 r., m. Kharkiv, Ukraina) [Personality, Society, Law: Psychological Problems and the Ways of their Solving: Collection of reports thesis of the International scientific and practical conference dedicated to memory of prof. S. P. Bocharova]. Kharkiv, pp. 36–38 (ukr).
[7] Klymchuk, V. O. (2015). Motyvatsiinyi dyskurs osobystosti v interaktsiinomu prostori [Personality’s Motivational Discourse in Interactional Space], Abstract of D. Sc. dissertation, Kyiv (ukr).
[8] Naidonov, M. I. (2010). Formuvannia refleksyvnoho upravlinnia v orhanizatsiiakh [Forming Reflexive Management in Organizations], Abstract of D. Sc. dissertation, Kyiv (ukr).
[9] Naidonova, L. A. (2005). Sotsialnyi ta refleksyvnyi kapital terytorialnykh spilnot yak chynnyk suspilnykh peretvoren [Territorial communities’ social and reflexive capital as a factor of social transformations]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka APN Ukrainy [Scientific Notes of the H. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology, APS of Ukraine], is. 26, vol. 3, 195–202 (ukr).
[10] Petrunko, O. V. (2014). Implitsytni modeli konsolidatsii hromadskoi dumky u svidomosti studentskoi molodi [Implicit models of consolidating public opinion in the student youth’ mentality]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii [Problems of Political Psychology], 1 (15), 75–86 (ukr).
[11] Pozniak, D. V. (2004). Refleksyvni mekhanizmy svidomosti vybortsiv yak subiektiv politychnoi vzaiemodii [Reflexive Mechanisms of Voters’ Mentality as the Actors of Political Interaction], Abstract of Ph. D. dissertation, Kyiv (ukr).