Interaction as a Factor of Personal Identity Formation in Senior Pupils: the Program of Empirical Study
Анотація
The program of empirical research is intended to determine the structure of role interaction in the senior pupils’ team, the status of each of them and the characteristics of their personal identity, the conditionality of its formation by the features of role interaction. The main hypothesis of the research is formulated: the peculiarities of the role interaction constructing in a small group to which the individual belongs, determine the levels of formation and characteristics of personality’s identity – the subjectivity of a person, the awareness of the I-image, the integration of the I-concept in time, integrity and structuring of cognitive, emotional and behavioral components. It is designed the general model of the influence of the senior pupil’s role interaction on the formation of his/her personal identity, as well as partial models, detailing the peculiarities of the interaction of group expectations and the individual role I-concept in the process of identity formation: from the diffuse – to the "moratorium" on self-determination or on the formation of borrowed identity, and from these states – to the formed identity. These typical states of youth identity for J. Marsia are considered as the stages of its formation in ontogenesis. Several additional hypotheses of the study are outlined: about the existence of a connection between sociometric status of a pupil in a school class, which is formed on the basis of role interaction, and the level of formation of personal identity; about the influence of the content of the roles performed by the student (positive, negative, dominant, dependent, social or interpersonal, formal or vital), on the peculiarities of the formation of personal identity; about the pupil’s ability to resist the pressure of the pupil group in the role interaction process, to coordinate their own role requirements with group expectations as the leading factors in the formation of mature personal identity
Використані джерела
[1] Berne, E. (1964). Igry, v kotoryye igrayut lyudi. Psikhologiya chelovecheskikh vzaimootnosheniy [Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships]. St. Petersburg: Lenizdat Publ. (rus).
[2] Burns, R. (1982). Razvitiye Ya-konteptsii i vospitaniye [Self-concept development and education]. Moscow: Progress Publ. (rus).
[3] Golentovska, O. S. (2017). Tsіnnіsno-rolova rehuliatsіia osobystіsnoi uspіshnostі u komandnіi dіialnostі [Psychology of role self-realization of personality]. Ph. D. Thesis, Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences, Kyiv, Ukraine (ukr).
[4] Gornostay, P. P. (2007). Lichnost i rol: Rolevoy podkhod v sotsialnoy psikhologii lichnosti [Personality and role: Role approach to social psychology personality]. Kyiv: Interpress LTD Publ. (rus). 5.
[5] Zlobina, O. H., & Shulha, M. O. (1997). Identychnist osobystosti ta yii zminy [Identity of personality and its changes]. Mystetstvo zhyttietvorchosti osobystosti. Teoriia i tekhnolohiia zhyttietvorchosti [The art of life-creativity of the person. [The theory and technology of life-creativity]. Kyiv, pp. 169–205 (ukr).
[6] Ivankiv, I. I. (2014). Іdentichnіst u sotsіalno-psykholohіchnykh proektsіiakh [Identity in social and psychological projection]. In L. D. Zahray (Eds.), Zbirnyk naukovykh prats: filosofiia, sotsiolohiia, psykholohiia [Collected Works: philosophy, sociology, psychology], 19, 46–53 (ukr).
[7] Shneyder, L. B. (2008). Identichnost: Khrestomatiya [Identity: Reader]. Moscow, Voronezh: Modek Publ. (rus).
[8] Lazarenko, V. A. (2011). Nabuttia starshoklasnykamy zriloi identychnosti yak neobkhidna umova psykholohichnoho zdorovia [Acquiring high school students mature identity as a prerequisite for mental health]. Osvita rehionu: politolohiia, psykholohiia, komunikatsii [Education region. Political science, psychology, social communication], 2, 81–92 (ukr).
[9] Moreno, J. L. (1951). Sotsiometriia: Eksperimentalnyy metod i nauka ob obshchestve [Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society: an approach to a new political orientation]. Moscow: Academicheskiy proekt Publ. (rus).
[10] Morosanova, V. I., Kondratyuk, N. G. (2011). Novaya versiya oprosnika: Stil samoregulyatsii povedeniya [New version of the questionnaire: Style of selfregulation of behavior]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], 1, 37– 145 (rus).
[11] Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2004). Oprosnik: Suverennost psikhologicheskogo prostranstva – novyy metod diagnostiki lichnosti [Questionnaire: Sovereignty of the psychological space – a new method of personality diagnosis]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 5, 77–89 (rus).
[12] Nikiforov, G. S. (1989). Samokontrol cheloveka [Self-control of a person]. Leningrad (rus).
[13] Pantileyev, S. R. (1993). Metodika issledovaniya samootnosheniya [Methodology of study of self-relation]. Psikhodiagnosticheskaya seriya [Psychodiagnostic series], 7, 32–41 (rus).
[14] Remshmitd, H. (1994). Podrostkovyy i yunosheskiy vozrast: problemy stanovleniya lichnosti [Adolescence and early adulthood: identity formation issues]. Moscow: Mir Publ. (rus).
[15] Andreyeva, G. M., Bogomolova, N. N., & Petrovskaya, L. A. (1984). Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya sotsialnaya psikhologiya. Teksty [Modern foreign social psychology. Texts]. Moscow (rus).
[16] Zlyvkov, V. L., Ball, G. O., Kyrpach, N. B., Kopylov, S. O., Kurhanska, L. O., Lukomska, S. O., Mykhailiuk, L. M., Morozovska, T. D., Homutinnіkova, N. N., Fedan, O.V. (2014). Stanovlennia іdentychnostі fakhіvtsia [The formation of a specialists identity]. Kirovohrad: Іmeks-LTD Publ. (ukr).
[17] Test “Kto Ya?” (Kun, M., Makpartlend, T.; Modifikatsiya Rumyantseva T. V.). (2006). In T. V. Rumyantseva, Psikhologicheskoye konsultirovaniye: diagnostika otnosheniy v pare, http: //vsetesti.ru.
[18] Fetiskin, N. P., Kozlov, V. V., & Manuylov, G. M. (2005). Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Social psychological diagnostics of personality development and small groups]. Moscow (rus).
[19] Chorna, L. H. (2014). Roliova identychnist starshoklasnykiv [Role identity of senior pupils]. Kyiv: Milenium Publ. (ukr).
[20] Chorna, L. H. (2016). Sotsiometrychnyi status ta rolova vzaiemodiia chleniv maloi hrupy [Sociometric status and role interaction of members of a small group]. Osobystist v umovakh kryzovykh vyklykiv suchasnosti: Materialy metodolohichnoho seminaru NAPN Ukrainy [Personality in the context of the crisis challenges of the present: Materials of the methodological seminar of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine], http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/704987.
[21] Shibutani, T. (1961). Sotsialnaya psikhologiya [Society and Personality: An Interactionist Approach to Social Psychology]. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks Publ. (rus).
[22] Shneyder, L. B. (2007). Lichnostnaya, gendernaya i professionalnaya identichnost: teoriya i metody diagnostiki [Personality, gender and professional identity: theory and methods of diagnostics]. Moscow (rus).
[23] Shtayner, K. (2003). Stsenarіi zhizni liydey. Shkola Erіka Berna [Scripts of peoples lives. Eric Berne]. St. Petersburg: Pіter Publ. (rus).
[24] Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identichnost: yunost i krisis [Identity: youth and crisis]. Moscow: Progress Publ. (rus).
[25] Demblon, J., & D’Argembeau, A. (2017). Contribution of past and future selfdefining event networks to personal identity. Journal Memory, 25, 656–665.
[26] Lindemann, H. (2014). Holding and letting go: the social practice of personal identities. New York: Oxford University Press.
[27] Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 109–137). New York: John Wiley. 28. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. The University of Chicago Press, 4, 176–189.