Subjective-action approach as a form of social and psychological thinking
Анотація
The article presents an attempt to define a subjective-action approach as a form of social and psychological thinking, which is a condition for its correct application in the study of social and psychological phenomena. Thus, from the general psychological idea of a person as a subject and of its subjectivity, transition to a social and psychological position on subjective-subjective interaction is maken, and from the general psychological idea about act – to the social and psychological statements of the act, interaction and joint action. The creative synthesis of these statements determines the specifics of the subjective-action approach as a scientific form of social and psychological thinking in accordance with the classificationgenetic model of such forms developed by M. M. Slyusarevskyy. It emphasizes the importance of forming and developing in a person as in a social creature motivation and ability to effectively apply the subjective-action approach in practice of its joint with other (mass, group, collective) non-professional (non-academic, nonproductive), everyday life
Використані джерела
[1] Slyusarevskyy, M. M. (2014). Sotsialno-psykholohichne myslennia: sutnist i formovyiavy [Social and psychological thinking: the essence and formmanifestations]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii [Scientific Studies in Social and Political Psychology], 34 (37), 5–24 (ukr).
[2] Freud, Z. (1989). Vvedeniye v psikhoanaliz: Lektsii [Introduction in Psychonalisys: Lectures] [Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (rus).
[3] Yung, C. G. (1991). Arkhetip i simvol [Archetype and Symbol]. Moscow: Renesans Publ. (rus).
[4] Berne, E. (2016). Ihry, u yaki hraiut lyudy [Games People Play (The Psychology of Human Relationships)]. Kharkiv: Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia Publ. (ukr).
[5] Rubynshteyn, S. L. and Shorokhova, E. V. (Eds.). (1973). Problemy obshchey psikhologii [Problems of general psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (rus).
[6] Berdyayev, N. A. (2004). Filosofiya svobody [Philosophy of Freedom]. Moscow: AST Publ. (rus).
[7] Sayko, Ye. V. (2006). Subyekt: sozidatel i nositel sotsialnogo [Subject: creator and bearer of social]. Moscow, Voronezh: Modek Publ. (rus).
[8] Shalyutin, B. S. (2017). So-subyektnost kak osnovaniye moralnogo, ponyatiynogo i religioznogo soznaniya [Co-subjectness as the basis of moral, conceptual and relgious consciousness], http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/shalyutin-bs/sosubektnost-kak-osnovanie-moralnogo-ponyatiynogo-i-religioznogo-soznaniya. (downloades 22 February) (rus).
[9] Leshkevich, T. G. (1998). Postneklassicheskaya metodologiya: evolyutsiya paradigmy fundamentalnoy filosofii [Post-non-classical methodology: the evolution of the fundamental philosophy paradigm]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya [Journal of Moscow University. Number 7. Philosophy], 6, 52–70 (rus).
[10] Yakovenko, I. G. (2004). Chelovek i kultura: dialektika vzaimodeystviya [Man and culture: dialectic of interaction]. Prostranstva zhizni subyekta: Edinstvo i mnogomernost subyektoobrazuyushchey sotsialinoy evolyutsii [Life space of subject: the unity and multidimensionality of subject forming social evolution] (pp. 117–148). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (rus).
[11] Petrovskiy, A. V. and Petrovskiy, V. A. (1982). Individ i ego potrebnost byt lichnostyu [Individual and his need to be a personality]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy], 3, 44–53 (rus).
[12] Hegel, G. F. (1977). Filosofiya dukha [Philosophy of psyche]. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3 [Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Mysl Publ. (rus).