Public opinion as an indicator for the process of educational reforms' implementation
Анотація
Authors upgrade the idea that communicative management methods are coming to the fore in modern society. They require moving to self-organization of society on the basis of public opinion constucting. Previous forming of public opinion provides an opportunity to influence on the promotion of social innovations. Support of such innovations is conditional upon the involvement of civil society participants to the construction of project of such innovations. The results of allUkrainian experiment aimed on the forming of positive public opinion regarding educational innovations are presented and analyzed. Public opinion is considered as a tool for the self-organization of society. It performs the function of feedback during the creation of common plan of building the future. According to the approach proposed construction of public opinion goes through two stages: primarily the collective author of future transformations is defining, when the ways of communications between the subjects of society are specifying. On the next stage common sociocultural project, which reveals in the public opinion, is constructed. It was revealed that negative attitude of different social groups' representatives toward social innovations is based on the distrust towards the state as an author of these reforms, which doesn't take interests of other subjects of society into account. However, declared personal interest of participants involved in the experiment gives hope for the possibility of positive changes realization in the educational system
Використані джерела
[1] Andriyanova, O. G. (2007). Shkola – sreda obitaniya budushchego [School is a habitat of the future]. Obrazovaniye i obshchestvo [Education and Society], 5, 79–82 (rus).
[2] Petrunko, O. V. (2012). Osvіtnі іnnovatsіi v Ukrainі: prychyny neefektyvnostі ta mozhlyvostі optimіzatsіi [Educational Innovations in Ukraine: the causes of inefficiency and opportunities for optimization]. Teorіia і metodyka profesіinoi osvіty [Theory and Methods of Professional Education], 3, http://tmpe.eor.by/images/docs/3/12petioo.pdf (ukr).
[3] Sushyi, O. V. (2015). Stratehіchnі prіorytety rozvytku osvіty u kontekstі yevropeiskoi іntehratsіi Ukrainy: chy stane reforma osvіty zaporukoiu uspіshnykh reform v Ukrainі u tsіlomu? [Strategic priorities of education in the context of European integration of Ukraine: Will education reform key to successful reforms in Ukraine in general?]. Ukrainskyi sotsіum [Ukrainian society], 4, 85–96 (ukr).
[4] Fedotova, M. G. (2010). K soderzhaniyu ponyatiya “tranzitivnoye obshchestvo” [To the content of the concept of "transitive society"]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of Vyatka State Humanitarian University], 1(4), 28–32 (rus).
[5] Fedotova, V. G. (Eds.). (2003). “Khorosheye obshchestvo”. Sotsialnoye konstruirovaniye priemlemogo dlya zhizni obshchestva [“Good society”. Social construction of an acceptable society]. Moscow: IF RAN Publ. (rus).
[6] Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-NetworkTheory. N. Y.: Oxford University Press.
[7] Slyadneva, N. A. (2001). Sotsialno-informatsionnyye tekhnologii kak sinergeticheskiy faktor evolyutsii slozhnykh sotsialnykh sistem [Social and informational technologies as a synergetic factor in the evolution of complex social systems]. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy zhurnal “Fakt” [Informational and analytical journal “Fact”], 9, http://www.fact.ru/www/arhiv9s3.htm (rus).
[8] Moskalev, I. Ye. (2007). Metodologiya i metodika gosudarstvennogo upravleniya innovatsionnymi sotsialnymi protsessami [Methodology and methods of state management of innovative social processes]. Obrazovaniye i obshchestvo [Education and Society], 5, 62–69 (rus).
[9] Khorіna, O. І. (2016). Osoblyvostі konstruuvannia refleksyvnoi tekhnolohii suprovodu osvіtnіkh ta suspіlnykh reform (praktychnyi aspekt) [Features of reflective technology design of educational and social reform support (practical aspect)]. Navchannia і vykhovannia obdarovanoi dytyny: teorіia і praktyka [Training and education of gifted child: Theory and Practice], 2, 131–140 (ukr).
[10] Plyushch, A. N. (2014). Sinergeticheskaya model organizatsii obshchestva [Synergetic model of society organization]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological researches], 10, 14–22 (rus).
[11] Petrunko, O. V. (2013). Konsolіduvalnyi potentsіal hromadskoi dumky: strukturna, dynamіchna ta funktsіonalna skladovі [Consolidation potential of public opinion: structural, dynamic and functional components]. Problemy polіtichnoi psykholohii ta yii rol u stanovlennі hromadianyna Ukrainskoi derzhavy [The problems of political psychology and its role in the development of the Ukrainian state citizen], 15, 207–214 (ukr).
[12] Іvanchenko, S. M. (2013). Suspіlnyi dyskurs yak sposіb organіzatsіi іnformatsіinoho prostoru ta formuvannia hromadskoi dumky [Public discource as a way of organization of informational space and forming of public opinion]. Naukovі studіi iz sotsіalnoi ta polіtychnoi psykholohii [Scientific Studies in Social and Political Psychology], 32 (35), 236–244 (ukr).
[13] Plyushch, A. N. (2011). Tekhnologii konstruirovaniya pozitivnogo obraza politicheskikh subyektov [Technologies for constructing a positive image of political subjects]. Vіsnyk Chernihіvskoho natsіonalnoho pedahohіchnoho unіversytetu [Bulletin of Chernihiv National Pedagogical University], B. 2, Is. 94, 83–90 (rus).
[14] Іvanchenko, S. M. (2014). Shliakhy formuvannia konsolіdovanoi hromadskoi dumky v tsіlovykh hrupax [Ways of consolidated public opinion forming in the target groups]. Problemy polіtychnoi psykholohii [The Problems of Political Psychology], 1(15), 267–273 (ukr).