Ukrainians’ perceptions of social solidarity: Empirical verification of the representational field
Abstract
The article presented an analysis of theoretical and empirical studies of social representations of solidarity among Ukrainians, carried out from an interdisciplinary perspective and using the method of free association experiment. On the basis of theoretical and empirical analysis, it was proved that solidarity is a fundamental psychological prerequisite for social change, and understanding its nature, forms and status is important for social development in general, and in particular, in the context of state-building. The empirical study of social representations of solidarity was carried out within the framework of the psychosemantic approach through the symbolic verbal mediation of these representations/perceptions and their socio-cultural context. The findings indicated a well-structured and coherent psychological structure of social solidarity representations, with a clearly defined core that extends into additional layers, suggesting a range of possible connections between solidarity and different aspects. The interpretation of these findings highlighted the dominant value-based elements of social solidarity, such as ideology, patriotism and spirituality, which were influenced by the current social reality and its willingness to accept and implement the changes necessary for successful modernisation, framed by a shift in emphasis towards subjectivity in the cultural context of action. Thus, attention was focused not only on the end result, but also on the actions that contribute to its achievement
References
[1] Abbott, O. (2020). The self as the locus of morality: A comparison between Charles Taylor and George Herbert Mead’s theories of the moral constitution of the self. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(4), 516-533. doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12246.
[2] Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2018). Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology for examining the construction and transformation of meaning in discourse and communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 732-753. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12259.
[3] Belejkaničová, M. (2021). Solidarity of the shaken: From the experience (Erlebnis) to history. Studies in East European Thought, 73(3), 287-307. doi: 10.1007/s11212-021-09421-6.
[4] Blatterer, H. (2022). Friendship and solidarity. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(2), 217-234. doi: 10.1177/1368431020982499.
[5] Buhagiar, L. J., & Sammut, G. (2020). “Social re-presentation for…”: An action-oriented formula for intergroup relations research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, article number 352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00352.
[6] Callero, P.L. (2014). Self, identity, and politics in the study of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: The promise of deliberative democracy. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity (pp. 367-387). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137391865_17.
[7] Capraro, V. (2024). The dual-process approach to human sociality: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of internalized heuristics for self-preservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(5), 719-757. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000375.
[8] Clay-Robison, S. (2022). Solidarity without Borders: Friendship, the Arts, and Social Movements. Peace Review, 34(3), 362–369. doi: 10.1080/10402659.2022.2092399.
[9] Dukhnevych, V. (2013). Principles of ensuring and organizing dialogical interaction. Current Issues in Psychology: Collection of Scientific Papers of the H.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 7(34), 74-83.
[10] Effron, D.A., & Knowles, E.D. (2015). Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 234-253. doi: 10.1037/ pspa0000020.
[11] Flick, U., Foster, J., & Caillaud, S. (2015). Researching social representations. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 64-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107323650.007.
[12] Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2018). Social cohesion revisited: A new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(2), 231-253. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480.
[13] Frankl, V. (2016). Man’s search for meaning. Kharkiv: Book Club “Family Leisure Club”.
[14] Goroshko, O., & Poliakova, T. (2019). Education 2.0: Psycholinguistic analysis. Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 27-45. doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-2-27-45.
[15] Gualda, E. (2022). Altruism, solidarity and responsibility from a committed sociology: Contributions to society. The American Sociologist, 53(1), 29-43. doi: 10.1007/s12108-021-09504-1.
[16] Hakoköngäs, E.J. (2017). Visual collective memory: A social representations approach. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
[17] Healy, M. (2020). The other side of belonging. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(2), 119-133. doi: 10.1007/ s11217-020-09701-4.
[18] Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2020). Social representations, identity threat, and coping amid COVID-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S249-S251. doi: 10.1037/tra0000773.
[19] Kaplan, D. (2018). Absent brother: Military friendship and commemoration. In The nation and the promise of friendship (pp. 189-206). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78402-1_9.
[20] Kapsali, M. (2024). Towards Transversal housing solidarities across space, time and subjects. Housing, Theory and Society, 41(5), 678-695. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2024.2324834.
[21] Katju, V. (2020). Friendship as social justice activism: Critical solidarities in a global perspective. Social Movement Studies, 20(4), 506-507. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2020.1770074.
[22] Kolers, A. (2016). A moral theory of solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[23] Lähdesmäki, T., & Čeginskas, V.L.A. (2022). Conceptualisation of heritage diplomacy in scholarship. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(5), 635-650. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2022.2054846.
[24] Lahusen, C. (2020). Civic solidarity in transnational spaces: Organisation and institutionalisation of solidarity within the European Union. In H. Krunke, H. Petersen & I. Manners (Eds.), Transnational solidarity: Concept, challenges and opportunities (pp. 301-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108766593.015.
[25] Leoussi, A.S. (2014). Belonging: Solidarity and division in modern societies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(3), 507510. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2014.928345.
[26] Lindenberg, S., Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., & Buunk, A.P. (2006). Solidarity and prosocial behavior: A framing approach. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A.P. Buunk & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/0-38728032-4_1.
[27] Loobuyck, P. (2012). Creating mutual identification and solidarity in highly diversified societies. The importance of identification by shared participation. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 560-575. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2012.10751793.
[28] Mensink, S. (2019). Prefiguration, strategic interaction and political belonging in undocumented migrant and solidarity movements. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(7), 1223-1239. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1561251.
[29] Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.
[30] Ovcharov, A. (2011). Mechanisms of integration-differentiation as socio-psychological factors of the evolution of ideologies. Collection of Scientific Papers, 11, 149-153.
[31] Pepple, D.G. (2020). Linking ethnic identification to organisational solidarity. Public Organization Review, 20(1), 113-128. doi: 10.1007/s11115-018-00431-3.
[32] Prykhodko, Y., & Yurchenko, V. (2012). Psychological dictionary-reference book. Kyiv: Karavela.
[33] Romaioli, D., & Contarello, A. (2022). Social constructionism and social representation theory: Convergences and divergences in the study of change. In A. Contarello (Ed.), Embracing change: Knowledge, continuity, and social representations (pp. 181-201). New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/ oso/9780197617366.003.0009.
[34] Romero-Iribas, A., & Oelsner, A. (2022). Social justice, social friendship, and the role of trust as an otheroriented emotion. Peace Review, 34(3), 352-361. doi: 10.1080/10402659.2022.2079946.
[35] Ryabchenko, N., Katermina, V., & Malysheva, O. (2019). Political content management: New linguistic units and social practices. Church, Communication and Culture, 4(3), 305-322. doi: 10.1080/23753234.2019.1664916.
[36] Saracino, D. (2024). The European Union’s response to the refugee movements from Ukraine: The end of the solidarity crisis? Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 1-22. doi: 10.54667/ceemr.2024.06.
[37] Schmitt, E. M., & Rademacher, C. (2023). What role for solidarity? A frame analysis of the solidarity conceptions of the German Laender governments in the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. European Politics and Society, 25(2), 350-374. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2023.2244380.
[38] Shynkaruk, V. (Ed.). (2002). Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Kyiv: Abrys.
[39] Sievers, Z., Dukhnevych, V., & Osadko, O. (2017). Applied aspects of the formation of political and legal consciousness of youth. Kropyvnytskyi: Imeks-LTD.
[40] Sliusarevskyi, M., Naidionova, L., Tytarenko, T., Tatenko, V., Hornostai, P., Kochubeinyk, O., & Lazorenko, B. (2020). The life-world and psychological security of a person in conditions of social changes: Abstract description of the work. Kyiv: Talkom.
[41] Straehle, C. (2020). Associative solidarity, relational goods, and autonomy for refugees: What does it mean to stand in solidarity with refugees? Journal of Social Philosophy, 51(4), 526-542. doi: 10.1111/josp.12339.
[42] Sushyi, O. (2018). The social psychology of nation-building: Conceptual framework and principles of research methodology. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 41(44), 3-19. doi: 10.33120/ssjpp.v41i44.2018.
[43] Syniavskyi, V., & Serhiienkova, O. (2007). Psychological dictionary. Kyiv: Naukovi Svit.
[44] Tamayo Gomez, C. (2021). Social solidarity as a dimension of transitional justice: the case of Cartography and Identification of Mass Graves in post-conflict Colombia. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(1), 50-73. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2021.1895763.
[45] Tatenko, V. (2021). Social psychology of nation-building: A subject-action approach. (2nd ed., revised and expanded). Kropyvnytskyi: Imeks-LTD.
[46] The Declaration of Helsinki. (1975). Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/ declaration-of-helsinki/.
[47] Tytarenko, T., Kochubeynik, O., & Cheremnykh, K. (2014). Psychological practices of life construction in the conditions of postmodern sociality. Kyiv: Millennium.
[48] Vasutyńskyi, V. (2010). Psychological dimensions of community. Kyiv: Zoloti Vorota.
[49] Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197-214. doi: 10.1080/00313220600769331.
[50] Zhovtianska, V. (2020). Psychology of reality representations. Kyiv: Talkom.