Open Access 29 June 2023

Exploring the hidden aspects of ChatGPT: A study on concerns regarding plagiarism levels

Received 15.03.2023
Revised 06.06.2023
Accepted 29.06.2023

Abstract

ChatGPT is a widely used chatbot model that has gained popularity. Concerns have been raised that ChatGPT may facilitate plagiarism. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether ChatGPT can distinguish between plagiarised and non-plagiarised texts. The purpose of the study was to investigate the potential of ChatGPT in generating plagiarism. The sample included various types of texts, such as manuscripts. Several questions about plagiarism were asked. The study found that the first version of ChatGPT cannot successfully detect plagiarism, although it can distinguish sentences written in academic sources from ordinary sentences. ChatGPT assumes that providing a reference to a previous source is sufficient. However, this does not mean that it is free from plagiarism. The findings of this study indicate that ChatGPT cannot fully recognise plagiarism

ChatGPT plagiarism rate plagiarism detection tool

References

[1] Anders, B.A. (2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns, 4(3), article number 100694. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100694.

[2] Chat GPT “DAN” (and other “Jailbreaks”). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://gist.github.com/ coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa881516. 

[3] Uludag, K. (2023). The use of AI-supported Chatbot in psychology. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=4331367.

[4] Uludag, K., Wang, D.M., Goodman, C., Chen, D.C., Wang, L., & Zhang, X.Y. (2021). Prevalence, clinical correlates and risk factors associated with tardive dyskinesia in Chinese patients with schizophrenia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 66, article number 102877. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102877.

Suggested citation

Uludag, K. (2023). Exploring the hidden aspects of ChatGPT: A study on concerns regarding plagiarism levels. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 29(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2023.43

Type to search...