Potential use of neuroimaging as a tool to monitor brain imaging changes in politicians related to unethical decision making
Abstract
Introduction. Political neuroimaging is an emerging field investigating neurological roots of political behavior, while many brain imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI provide quantifiable information. However, the literature is scarce on its practical applications in political sciences since it's unclear how it impacts political sciences. Put it simply, how the developments in neuroimaging can be used as a tool in politics, especially to monitor and assess their decision-making related to criminal acts such as corruption, is unclear. In addition, there are potential ethical limitations preventing investigators from using brain imaging to evaluate and monitor the behavior of politicians.
The aim of the study was to discuss the potential role of neuroimaging as a political tool. Neuroimaging tools can help us demonstrate specific abnormal behavior associated with politically unethical behavior, such as corruption or deceptive behavior. However, documenting brain imaging findings specific to such deviant behavior may be challenging. Here, we suggest that the practical use of political neuroimaging can improve transparency in the political field. It can be recommended to analyze and have insights into the decisionmaking process of politicians. Furthermore, neurofeedback tools such as electroencephalography can be used to improve politicians' decision-making.
Methodology. This study is not a systematic review as the literature is not wide on neuroimaging as a political tool. We have used Google Scholar to search relevant articles to provide background to support it.
Review and Discussion. In this study, we have speculated on the potential of measuring politically inappropriate behavior such as corruption and deceptive conduct. To investigate it, we have discussed measuring psychological stability before and after being a politician. More studies are needed to help politicians have stable psychology and improve their decision-making. Therefore, it may help to improve productivity. However, some many confounding factors and limitations prevent achieving such a goal.
Conclusion. In conclusion, political neuroimaging can be used to create beneficial tools to improve and ensure the psychological stability of politicians. However, it is controversial how it can be implemented to assess the political behavior of politicians. Thereby, more studies are needed to elucidate the decision-making process related to politicians' decisionmaking. Such advanced tools can help select better politicians and improve their decisionmaking by providing feedback
References
[1] Boyatzis, R. E. (2014). Possible contributions to leadership and management development from neuroscience: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY.
[2] Cottam, M. L., Mastors, E., Preston, T., & Dietz, B. (2015). Introduction to political psychology: Routledge.
[3] deBettencourt, M. T., Cohen, J. D., Lee, R. F., Norman, K. A., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2015). Closed-loop training of attention with real-time brain imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 18(3), 470-475. doi:10.1038/nn.3940
[4] Delfin, C., Krona, H., Andiné, P., Ryding, E., Wallinius, M., & Hofvander, B. (2019). Prediction of recidivism in a long-term follow-up of forensic psychiatric patients: Incremental effects of neuroimaging data. PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0217127. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217127
[5] DOWDING, K. M., & KIMBER, R. (1983). The Meaning and Use of ‘Political Stability’*. European Journal of Political Research, 11(3), 229-243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6765.1983.tb00060.x
[6] Haas, I. J., Warren, C., & Lauf, S. J. (2020). Political neuroscience: Understanding how the brain makes political decisions Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
[7] Hannula, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2010). What is the added value of neuroimaging for research in educational psychology? A research example from studies on spontaneous focusing on numerosity. Paper presented at the Front. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: EARLI SIG22-Neuroscience and Education. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnins.
[8] Illes, J. (2007). Empirical neuroethics. EMBO reports, 8(S1), S57-S60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7 401007
[9] Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126-136.
[10] Köbis, N. C., van Prooijen, J.-W., Righetti, F., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Prospection in Individual and Interpersonal Corruption Dilemmas. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 71-85. doi:10.1037/gpr0000069
[11] Koffarnus, M. N., & Kaplan, B. A. (2018). Clinical models of decision making in addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 164, 71-83.
[12] Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2003). Is Political Cognition Like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking. Political Psychology, 24(4), 681-704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467- 9221.2003.00347.x
[13] Luber, B., Fisher, C., Appelbaum, P. S., Ploesser, M., & Lisanby, S. H. (2009). Non-invasive brain stimulation in the detection of deception: Scientific challenges and ethical consequences. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(2), 191-208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.860
[14] Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A.E., Steele, G. M., & Thompson, A. W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 901-907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.013
[15] Sai, L., Bellucci, G., Wang, C., Fu, G., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2021). Neural mechanisms of deliberate dishonesty: Dissociating deliberation from other control processes during dishonest behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(43), e2109208118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2109208118
[16] Sartori, R., Costantini, A., & Ceschi, A. (2020). Psychological assessment in human resource management: discrepancies between theory and practice and two examples of integration. Personnel Review.
[17] Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2011). Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense. Behavioral sciences & the law, 29(4), 592-607.
[18] Sokunbi, M. O. (2017). Feedback of real-time fMRI signals: From concepts and principles to therapeutic interventions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 35, 117-124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2016. 08.004
[19] Speer, S. P., Smidts, A., & Boksem, M. A. (2020). Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19080-19091.
[20] Thibault, R. T., Lifshitz, M., Birbaumer, N., & Raz, A. (2015). Neurofeedback, self-regulation, and brain imaging: clinical science and fad in the service of mental disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(4), 193-207.
[21] Thibault, R. T., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2016). The self-regulating brain and neurofeedback: Experimental science and clinical promise. Cortex, 74, 247-261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.20 15.10.024
[22] Thibault, R. T., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2017). Neurofeedback or neuroplacebo? Brain, 140(4), 862-864.
[23] Verdejo-Garcia, A., Chong, T. T. J., Stout, J. C., Yücel, M., & London, E. D. (2018). Stages of dysfunctional decision-making in addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 164, 99-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2017.02.003
[24] Xue, G., Chen, C., Lu, Z.-L., & Dong, Q. (2010). Brain Imaging Techniques and Their Applications in Decision- Making Research. Xin li xue bao. Acta psychologica Sinica, 42(1), 120-137. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00120