Practical aspects of creation of alternative and augmentative communication symbols for communication skills rehabilitation in people with aphasia
Abstract
It is described a process of alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) creation for a practical survey of AAC symbols usage in 90 patients after a brain stroke. Speech problems are presented as one of the main consequences of neurological diseases like brain stroke in adults and aged people. Alternative and augmentative communication is defined as an effective tool in the rehabilitation of speech and communication impairments as well as a compensatory opportunity for people with aphasia. The aim of the survey was to study a communicative response to used AAC symbols in early speech rehabilitation. A central issue was to study cases of AAC usage and to describe a process of images (pictograms) understanding by patients, and to describe important characteristics of the used symbols and phrases. The survey is based on observations of professionals who filled an online form after the speech rehabilitation of patients with aphasia during the first 2 weeks after a brain stroke. The survey is used to discuss the content of symbols before the creation. Nominal and rank scales are used to specify whether patients understood images on cards and identified them with real objects, states, needs, or actions. Quantitative results showed that 70% of patients had positive emotional reactions towards cards usage in communication. In most cases, patients had positive dynamics on speech reconstruction, and specialists reported on patients’ rising motivation to communicate with caregivers. The article summarizes a Ukrainian experience of AAC symbols creation and usage for early rehabilitation of patients after a brain stroke, and this attempt can attract more attention to possible experimental research about AAC visual stimuli effectiveness in aphasia cases to improve patients' social integration
References
[1] Asha.org. 2021. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Retieved from https://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/aac/ (1 April 2021). (in English)
[2] Coelho, C. (1991). Manual sign acquisition and use in two aphasic subjects. (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology, 19, 209–218. (in English)
[3] Davis, G. (2005). PACE revisited. Aphasiology, 19(1), 21–38. (in English)
[4] Dietz, A., Wallace, S., & Weissling, K. (2020). Revisiting the Role of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Aphasia Rehabilitation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(2), 909– 913. (in English)
[5] DyvoGra. 2021. Reabilitatsiia pislia insultu. http://www.dyvogra.com. Retrieved from http://www.dyvogra.com/uk/cards-for-adults/ (1 April 2021). (in Ukrainian)
[6] Griffith, J., Dietz, A., & Weissling, K. (2014). Supporting Narrative Retells for People With Aphasia Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Photographs or Line Drawings? Text or No Text? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), 213–224. (in English)
[7] Isaac-online.org. (2021). ISAAC – What is AAC? Retrieved from https://isaac-online.org/english/what-is-aac/ (1 April 2021). (in English)
[8] Jacobs, B., Drew, R., Ogletree, B., & Pierce, K. (2004). Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for adults with severe aphasia: where we stand and how we can go further. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(21-22), 1231–1240. (in English)
[9] Johnson, R., Hough, M., King, K., Vos, P., & Jeffs, T. (2008). Functional Communication in Individuals with Chronic Severe Aphasia Using Augmentative Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 269–280. (in English)
[10] Kraat, A. W. (1990). Augmentative and alternative communication: Does it have a future in aphasia rehabilitation? Aphasiology, 4:4, 321–338. (in English)
[11] Lliana, O. V. (2015). Cuchasni uiavlennia shchodo patohenezu ta proiaviv afazii pry mozkovomu insulti. Pedahohichni nauky: teoriia, istoriia, innovatsiini tekhnolohii, 7 (51). (in Ukrainian)
[12] Lyon, J., Cariski, D., Keisler, L., Rosenbek, J., Levine, R., Kumpula, J., Ryff, C., Coyne, S., & Blanc, M. (1997). Communication partners: Enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings. Aphasiology, 11(7), 693–708. (in English)
[13] Phc.org.ua. 2021. 29 zhovtnia – Vsesvitnii den borotby s insultom. Tsentr hromadskoho zdorovia. Retrieved from https://phc.org.ua/news/29-zhovtnya-vsesvitniy-den-borotbi-z-insultom (1 April 2021). (in English)
[14] Polishchuk, M. Ye. (Ed.) (2017). Insult. Informatsiia dlia vsikh, koho tse stosuietsia. Ed. 5th, done and complemented. Kyiv: D. V. Huliaiev. (in Ukrainian)
[15] Schnakers, C., Rosenberg, S., Lam, M., Bustamante, E., Divine, J., Millan, H., & Rosario, E. (2017). Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention in Patients with Aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(10), 36. (in English)
[16] Techner, S., & Martynsen, KH. (2014). Vvedeniye v alternativnuyu kommunikatsiyu: zhesty i graficheskiye simvoly dlya lyudey s dvigatelnymi i intellektualnymi narusheniyami, a takzhe rasstroystvami autisticheskogo spektra. Moscow: Terevinf. (in Russian)
[17] Usatenko, H. V., & Chayka, M. S. (2020). Zastosuvannia alternatyvnoi i dodatkovoi komunikatsii: teoretychnyi ohliad vizualnykh zasobiv ADK. International Scientific And Practical Conference «Surrent Trends And Factors Of The Development Of Pedagogical And Psychological Sciences In Ukraine And Eu Countries», Conference Proceedings, September 25–26. Lublin: Baltija Publishing. (in Ukrainian)
[18] Zakon.rada.gov.ua. 2021. Konventsiia pro prava osib s invalidnistiu. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_g71#Text (31 March 2021). (in Ukrainian)