Open Access 17 January 2020

The challenges of communication risks for the personality: A theoretical analysis of contemporary researches


Pages: 59-66
Received 17.01.2020
Revised 17.01.2020
Accepted 17.01.2020

Abstract

It is made an attempt to outline the problematic field of communication risks’ negative consequences to the individual in the modern world. The urgency of this problem is dictated by the fact that recently Ukrainian society has been, on the one hand, under the sights of information influence as a result of hybrid wars in the geopolitical space, and, on the other, the population has often fallen victims of unrestricted, arbitrary access to information and communication technologies. It is emphasized that the current state of the information environment of Ukrainian society significantly influences the person’s adaptation to today’s realities. According to statistics, Ukrainians are rapidly embracing information technology, showing high employment rates on digital platforms, and growing the dynamics of Internet usage. Therefore, all this increases the risk of unpredictable transformation of the human communication sphere. Considering the dynamic and interdisciplinary nature of the problem, the author of this article is footing on the findings and conclusions presented in the journals included in the scientific databases, particularly, Web of Science. So, the proposed theoretical analysis is a search for adequate characteristics and signs of contemporary communication risks to the individual. Based on the analysis of the problem of communication risks in the modern world, there are outlined the certain characteristics of those dangers and threats that they generate. Firstly, there is a risk of the critical burden on human adaptation and regulatory mechanisms and as a consequence of the need to determine the integral acceptability of communication risk to human mental health. Secondly, the voluntary implementation (unlimited by any means; by own will) of information and communication technologies into social and interpersonal interaction, which creates the tendency of social well-being and mental health deterioration. Thirdly, the multilevel transformation of the interpersonal communication system, which creates the conditions to form a conglomerate of personal safety locks to overcome the excessive pressure of information risks. The identified range of dangers allows us to get closer to the development of an adequate strategy for the sociopsychological support of the individual in the context of the multi-level transformation of the interpersonal communication system

communication risks information and communication technologies online risks transformation of the interpersonal communication system

References

[1] Aleksynska, M., Bastrakova, A., & Kharchenko, N. (2018). Zainiatist cherez tsyfrovi platformy v Ukraini. Problemy ta stratehichni perspektyvy [Employment through digital platforms in Ukraine. Problems and strategic perspectives]. Retrieved from http://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=777& page=3&t=13. (in Ukrainian)

[2] Andreyeva, G. (2003). Sotsialnaya psikhologiya: uchebnik [Social Psychology: a textbook]. Moskow: Aspect Press. (in Russian)

[3] Barg, A. O., & Lebedeva-Nesevrya, N. (2014). Risk-kommunikatsiya kak mekhanizm formirovaniya adekvatnoy otsenki riskov dlya zdorovya naseleniya [Risk-communication as an effective way of producing the cumulative acceptability of human health risks]. Zdorovye naseleniya i sreda obitaniya , 12 (261), 9–11. (in Russian)

[4] Bayeva, L. (2015). Virtualnaya kommunikatsiya: osobennosti i eticheskiye printsipy [Virtual Communication: Features and Ethical Principles]. Filosofskiye nauki, (10), 94–110. (in Russian)

[5] Druzhilov, S. A. (2018). Sovremennaya informatsionnaya sreda i ekologiya cheloveka: psikhologicheskiye aspekty [Modern information environment and human ecology: psychological aspects]. Gigiyena i sanitariya, 97( 7), 597–603. (in Russian)

[6] Gnatik, E. N. (2018). Rol informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v kulturnom prostranstve vysshego obrazovaniya: mif i realnost [The Role of Information Technology in the Cultural Space of Higher Education: Myth and Reality]. Observatoriya kultury, 15(4), 490–501. (in Russian)

[7] Karpova, A. Yu. (2017). Markery i effekty informatsionnoy anomii v politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Markers and the effects of information anomie in political communication]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, (40), 112–121. (in Russian)

[8] Kasavina, N. A. (2018). Chelovek i tekhnika: ambivalentnost elektronnoy kultury [Man and Technology: Ambivalence of Digital Culture]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 55(4), 129–142. (in Russian)

[9] Kasimova, S. O., & Garaybayli, G. Ch. (2015). Izucheniye stilya kommunikatsii u bolnykh s depressiyey [Study of communication styles in depressive patients]. Psikhiatriya i psikhofarmakoterapiya, 17(5-6), 59–62. (in Russian)

[10] Kharchenko, N. (2017). Dynamika korystuvannia Interenet v Ukraini: traven 2017 [Dynamics of Internet usage in Ukraine: May 2017]. Retieved from http://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports& id=705&page=1&t=5 (in Ukrainian)

[11] Kislitsyna, O., & Ferlander, S. (2015). Rol sotsialnykh otnosheniy v obyasnenii sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh razlichiy v sostoyanii zdorovya rossiyan [Role of social relations in explaining socio-economic health disparities among the Russians]. Sotsialnyye aspekty zdorovya naseleniya, 44 (4), 4–5. (in Russian)

[12] Kuchma, V. R. (2017). Gigiyenicheskaya bezopasnost giperinformatizatsii zhiznedeyatelnosti detey [The minimization of the impact of information and communication technologies on the health and well-being of children]. Gigiyena i sanitariya, 96(11), 105–1063. (in Russian)

[13] Levashov, V. K., Saryan, W. K., Nazarenko, A. P., Novozhenina, O. P., Toshchenko, I. Zh., Sushpanova, I. S., & Salomatina, E. V. (2016). Razvitiye informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologiy i perspektivy grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Civil society in the networks of information and communication technologies]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 9, 13–20. (in Russian)

[14] Pocheptsov, G. G. (2000). Informatsionnyye voyny [Information Wars]. Moscow: Refl-book; Kyiv: Vakler. (in Russian)

[15] Rippinen, T. O., & Slobodskaya, H. R. (2014). Vzaimosvyazi lichnostnykh osobennostey podrostkov s povsednevnym ispolzovaniyem kompyutera [Relationship of adolescents personal peculiarities with everyday use of computer]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 35 (4), 18–25. (in Russian)

[16] Rybakov, O. Yu., & Tichonova, S. V. (2016). Informatsionnyye riski i effektivnost pravovoy politiki [Information Risks and the Efficiency of Legal Policy]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 3 (231), 88–95 (in Russian)

[17] Shapovalova, I. S. (2015). Vliyaniye internet-kommunikatsiy na povedeniye i intellektualnoye razvitiye molodezhi [Internet-communications impact of behavior and intellectual development of young people]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 4, 148–151. (in Russian)

[18] Soldatova, G., & Rasskazova, E. (2019). Neosvedomlennost roditeley o stolknovenii podrostkov s riskami v internete: soderzhaniye i psikhologicheskiye faktory [Parental unawareness about online risks in adolescence: revalence and psychological factors]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 40(1), 71–83. (in Russian)

[19] Volkova, E. N., & Grishina, A. V. (2015). Structure of subjectivity of younger teenagers with different levels of computer addiction. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 36(2), 20–31. (in English)

[20] Yanitskiy, O. N. (2016). Sovremennyye seti i infrastruktury v svete teorii obshchestva riska [Modern Networks and Infrastructures in Lightof the Risk-Society]. Sotsiologiya, etnologiya, 25(3), 37–55. (in Russian)

[21] Zherebin, V. M., Alexeyeva, O. A., & Vershinskaya, O. N. (2017). Sotsialno-psikhologicheskiye osobennosti polzovateley Interneta [Socio-psychological features of Internet users]. Narodonaseleniye, 1 (75), 116–124. (in Russian)

Suggested citation

Larina, T. (2019). The challenges of communication risks for the personality: A theoretical analysis of contemporary researches. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 25(2), 59-66.

Type to search...